Page 84 of 122

Re: Politics

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 11:13 pm
by joez
Image
Image
Giuliani remarks on hush money may have added to Trump woes

WASHINGTON (AP) — Rudy Giuliani may have added to the legal headaches of his new law client and old friend, President Donald Trump, when he drew a link Thursday between a hush money payment to a porn actress and the potential fallout if her allegations of a tryst with Trump had gone public before the 2016 election.

Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and U.S. attorney, said in a series of interviews that Trump reimbursed his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, for a secret $130,000 payment to adult-film star Stormy Daniels in October 2016. Trump himself acknowledged the reimbursement in tweets Thursday morning after previously denying he knew about the payment.


Both Trump and Giuliani insisted that the reimbursement was made from Trump’s personal funds and that the initial payment had nothing to do with the campaign. But then Giuliani made the link himself, telling “Fox & Friends”: “Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton.”

Several experts in campaign finance law, who already had raised questions about the payment, said the case that the payment violated federal law had only grown stronger.

“I can say that Giuliani has done Trump no favors, especially this morning when he suggested Trump’s motive was campaign-related. That’s a huge deal,” Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Irvine, wrote in an email.

Trevor Potter, president of the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, said Giuliani’s statement that the payment kept Daniels’ allegation from the public “is an admission that the confidentiality agreement and the timing of the payment influenced the 2016 elections.”

The payment was not reported by the Trump campaign, and if it were to be counted as a contribution, it would vastly exceed the $2,700-per-election limit. If the money could be construed as a loan from Trump, it would still have to be reported but would not be subject to any limits, Hasen said.

Watchdog groups had previously filed complaints about the payment with the Federal Election Commission, the Office of Government Ethics and the Justice Department. There can be both civil and criminal penalties if investigators determine that the campaign or Cohen intended to keep the payment secret.

But this is not an easy standard to prove in court, said Jan Baran, a longtime elections and ethics lawyer. Prosecutors failed to get a conviction against Democratic Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina on charges that he received illegal contributions and falsified documents to pay for the silence of his pregnant mistress as he campaigned for president in 2008.

“If anything, the facts surrounding Mr. Edwards were arguably more campaign-related than what is happening today,” Baran said.

Questions swirled Thursday about why Giuliani and Trump decided to acknowledge that the president had reimbursed Cohen.

Norm Eisen, who served as an ethics lawyer in the Obama White House and now chairs the left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, which has repeatedly challenged Trump, said it might have to do with the fact that Cohen is under criminal investigation in New York. FBI agents raided his home and office several weeks ago seeking records about the nondisclosure agreement.

“I think the other intention here apparently was to tear the Band-Aid off and to get out in public whatever Cohen might offer should he choose to cooperate,” Eisen speculated.

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, embraced a similar possible explanation.

“You know, there’s an old saying in the law: ‘Hang a lantern on your problems.’ So he comes in, he knows that there’s been different stories being told about this payment and how it was made,” Christie, a friend of Trump’s, told ABC News. “So the fact is that Rudy has to go out there now and clean it up. That’s what lawyers get hired to do. So he goes out there and he puts it out rather than having some reporter give breaking news that the president reimbursed it.”

Baran, however, offered caution about drawing too many conclusions.

“We are dependent on what facts we know today and, as we know with President Trump, facts can change on a daily, if not hourly, basis,” he said.


( WHAT A TRAGEDY THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS PROVEN TO BE. WE HAVE A BUNCH OF AMATEURS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY. WE'RE IN CHAOS. TRUMP AND HIS BAND OF MISFITS ARE AN EMBARRASSMENT. A BUNCH OF LIARS, CHEATERS, JUST PLAIN DESTRUCTIVE; YET, 40% OF THE COUNTRY IS OK WITH IT - GO FIGURE :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: )

https://www.apnews.com/f84d92ab647142b0 ... Trump-woes





Image
Image
( NO WHERE TO RUN - NO WHERE TO HIDE NOW - JUST KEEP LYING - MAYBE IT WILL GO AWAY )

Trump’s new ‘Stormy’ story clashes with earlier statements

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump insisted Thursday his reimbursement of a 2016 hush payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels had nothing to do with his election campaign. But the surprise revelation of the president’s payment clashed with his past statements, created new legal headaches and stunned many in the West Wing.

White House aides were blindsided when Trump’s recently added attorney, Rudy Giuliani, said Wednesday night that the president had repaid Michael Cohen for $130,000 that was given to Daniels to keep her quiet before the 2016 election about her allegations of an affair with Trump. Giuliani’s revelation, which seemed to contradict Trump’s past statements, came as the president’s newly configured outside legal team pursued his defense, apparently with zero coordination with the West Wing.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she first learned that Trump had repaid the hush money from Giuliani’s interview on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.” Staffers’ phones began to buzz within moments. Deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley, who had pre-taped an interview with Fox News earlier Wednesday evening, was suddenly summoned to return for a live interview.


While Giuliani said the payment to Daniels was “going to turn out to be perfectly legal,” legal experts said the new information raised a number of questions, including whether the money represented repayment of an undisclosed loan or could be seen as reimbursement for a campaign expenditure. Either could be legally problematic.

Giuliani insisted Trump didn’t know the specifics of Cohen’s arrangement with Daniels until recently, telling “Fox & Friends” on Thursday that the president didn’t know all the details until “maybe 10 days ago.” Giuliani told The New York Times that Trump had repaid Cohen $35,000 a month “out of his personal family account” after the campaign was over. He said Cohen received $460,000 or $470,000 in all for expenses related to Trump.

But no debt to Cohen was listed on Trump’s personal financial disclosure form, which was certified on June 16, 2017. Asked if Trump had filed a fraudulent form, Sanders said: “I don’t know............”


https://www.apnews.com/8a48ef57cc8c42da ... statements





Image
Image
Giuliani’s Defense Only Intensifies the Legal Risks for Trump

The former New York mayor said in an interview that a payment made on the president’s behalf to Stormy Daniels prevented damaging information from emerging during the 2016 election.


Rudy Giuliani, who joined President Trump’s personal legal team last week, told Fox News on Thursday that the Trump attorney Michael Cohen had arranged a payment to the adult-film actress Stormy Daniels in order to prevent allegations of an affair from coming out in the closing days of the 2016 election.

The former New York City mayor’s explanation for the $130,000 payment to Daniels suggests the deal likely ran afoul of campaign-finance laws.

On Thursday morning, Trump tweeted that Cohen “received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign … used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair.” “Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll [sic] in this transaction,” the president insisted.

( LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE :lol: :lol: :lol: )

That statement, legal experts said, appears to confirm that the payment was a campaign expenditure. “This is good circumstantial evidence this was campaign-related,” said Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. “Giuliani did Trump no favors.”


( GOTTA LOVE IT :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: )

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... dy/559577/





Image
Image
4 words from Rudy Giuliani unwound months of White House misdirection about Stormy Daniels

(CNN)On Wednesday night, in the unlikeliest of places -- the cozy conservative comfort of Sean Hannity's show on Fox News -- the web of stories constructed by President Donald Trump and those around him to explain a $130,000 hush payment to porn star Stormy Daniels came tumbling down.

It was in that setting that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is now a legal adviser to Trump, acknowledged that the President had repaid attorney/fixer Michael Cohen the $130,000 that Cohen had directed to Daniels via a shell company just 11 days before the election to ensure she remained silent about an alleged sexual liaison she and Trump had in the mid 2000s.

"The President repaid it,'' said Giuliani. And, with those four words, Giuliani turned months and months of explanations and excuses about the Cohen payment on their head.

The stories pile one on top of the other so let's break them out -- starting with Trump.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/03/politics ... index.html





Image
Image
A Pruitt Aide's Attack on Zinke Angers the White House

A press staffer at the Environmental Protection Agency attempted to distract from his boss’s troubles by planting stories that would reflect poorly on the secretary of the interior.


As Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt faces a seemingly endless stream of scandal, his team is scrambling to divert the spotlight to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. And the White House isn’t happy about it.

In the last week, a member of Pruitt’s press team, Michael Abboud, has been shopping negative stories about Zinke to multiple outlets, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the efforts, as well as correspondence reviewed by The Atlantic.

“This did not happen, and it’s categorically false,” EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox said.

The stories were shopped with the intention of “taking the heat off of Pruitt,” the sources said, in the aftermath of the EPA chief’s punishing congressional hearing last week. They both added, however, that most reporters felt the story was not solid enough to run. On Thursday, Patrick Howley of Big League Politics published a piece on the allegations; he did not respond to request for comment as to his sources.

As Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt faces a seemingly endless stream of scandal, his team is scrambling to divert the spotlight to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. And the White House isn’t happy about it.

In the last week, a member of Pruitt’s press team, Michael Abboud, has been shopping negative stories about Zinke to multiple outlets, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the efforts, as well as correspondence reviewed by The Atlantic.

“This did not happen, and it’s categorically false,” EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox said.

The stories were shopped with the intention of “taking the heat off of Pruitt,” the sources said, in the aftermath of the EPA chief’s punishing congressional hearing last week. They both added, however, that most reporters felt the story was not solid enough to run. On Thursday, Patrick Howley of Big League Politics published a piece on the allegations; he did not respond to request for comment as to his sources............ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ks/559607/





Image
Image
Michael Caputo says 'it's clear' Mueller investigators focused on Russia collusion

(CNN)After being interviewed by special counsel investigators on Wednesday, former aide to Donald Trump's presidential campaign Michael Caputo told CNN that Robert Mueller's team is "focused on Russia collusion."

"It's clear they are still really focused on Russia collusion," Caputo said, adding, "They know more about the Trump campaign than anyone who ever worked there."

Caputo, who advised the Trump campaign on communications in 2016, has long insisted he has no information about collusion between Trump's team and Russia. He spoke with Senate intelligence investigators on Tuesday for their Russia probe and outlined the differences between Congress' inquiries and the special counsel's.

"The Senate and the House are net fishing," Caputo said. "The special counsel is spearfishing. They know what they are aiming at and are deadly accurate."

Caputo lived and worked in Russia in the 1990s and later did business with Russian companies, including Gazprom, the Kremlin-controlled energy giant. As a Republican consultant, Caputo worked with Trump adviser Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, the former campaign chairman. He denies any wrongdoing regarding Russia. Caputo is a longtime ally of Stone's, a close associate of Trump who has come under scrutiny in the Russian investigation because of Stone's contacts with WikiLeaks during the campaign.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/02/politics ... index.html





Image
Image
Sarah Sanders defends Trump's shifting story on porn star payment

Washington (CNN)White House press secretary Sarah Sanders sought to defend President Donald Trump's credibility -- and her own -- during a lively press briefing Thursday.

Sanders was asked repeatedly about Trump's changing story on the circumstances around a $130,000 hush money payment made to porn actress Stormy Daniels by the President's attorney Michael Cohen over an alleged affair. Trump has denied the affair and previously told reporters he didn't know about the payment. Trump's new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, told Fox News Wednesday that Trump had reimbursed Cohen for the payment and Thursday morning the President tweeted the money came from the retainer he paid Cohen.

"This was information that the President didn't know at the time but eventually learned," Sanders said about the President's Air Force One claim he didn't know about the payment.

"We give the very best information that we have at the time. I do that every single day," Sanders said when answering a question on why Americans should trust anything the White House says when often it turns out to be untrue.

CNN's Jim Acosta pressed Sanders on whether she was kept in the dark regarding Trump's reimbursement to Cohen. Sanders would not directly respond, only reiterating that she gave the press "the best information that I had."

:o :o :o :o

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/03/politics ... index.html






Image
Image
GOP Rep. Dent calls for oversight hearings on Stormy Daniels payment

(CNN)In the wake of Rudy Giuliani's statements about the hush payment made to Stormy Daniels, outgoing Republican Rep. Charlie Dent called for congressional oversight hearings into the matter, suggesting that it would be hypocritical not to hold them.

"I think there is certainly a role for Congress," the Pennsylvania Republican said on CNN's "Newsroom" on Thursday.

"Let's put the shoe on the other foot," Dent said. "If a Democratic president had paid off a porn star to keep quiet while he was president, I suspect we'd have oversight hearings, and I suspect there should be some oversight hearings to get to the bottom of this."

"If a Democratic president had done this, we'd be waving a bloody shirt right now," he said of his Republican House colleagues.

On Wednesday night, Giuliani, a member of President Donald Trump's legal team, disclosed that the President had paid back the $130,000 his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, had used to pay for Daniels' silence about an alleged affair. Trump had previously said he was unaware of the payment to the adult film star. On Thursday morning, Trump denied that any of his campaign money was used to reimburse Cohen and said the lawyer was paid via retainer.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/03/politics ... index.html





Image
Image
Analysis: Tariffs won't slow China's tech rise

China's aggressive efforts to become a tech superpower have long worried many American business leaders, and now are fueling trade tensions with the United States. But experts say the US government needs to come up with a smarter response.

President Donald Trump is sending his top economic advisers to China this week for talks about the trade dispute in which the two countries have threatened to slap tariffs on tens of billions of dollars of each other's exports.

The US government says it's taking action against China over policies that have enabled Chinese firms to unfairly get their hands on sensitive technology from American companies. At the heart of the concerns is "Made in China 2025," Beijing's plan to pump hundreds of billions of dollars into industries like robotics, electric cars and computing with the aim of becoming a global leader in those areas...........


http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/02/technol ... index.html





Image
Image
Dick's Sporting Goods hires lobbyists on gun control

Dick’s Sporting Goods has reportedly retained several lobbyists to urge lawmakers to take action on gun control, months after restricting gun sales in its stores.

The sporting-goods chain is working with three lobbyists from the Glover Park Group to take on the topic, Bloomberg reported Thursday, citing a disclosure form filed late last month.

The move comes after Dick’s announced in the wake of the mass shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school in February that it would stop selling assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines.


The chain also said it would no longer sell guns to anyone under the age of 21 and later announced it would destroy some of the guns or accessories left in stock.

A spokesman for Dick’s declined to comment to Bloomberg for its report, and Glover Park didn’t respond to the outlet's requests for comment.

Dick’s CEO Edward Stack vowed to take action on gun violence in the wake of the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, which left 17 students and faculty dead.

"Based on what's happened, and looking at those kids and those parents, it moved us all unimaginably and to think about the loss and the grief that those kids and those parents had, we said, we need to do something," Stack said during a February interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

However, Bloomberg noted that it’s unusual for retailers to hire lobbyists on topics like guns, which could alienate some potential customers.

Several other retailers also chose to place restrictions on or entirely eliminate the selling of firearms after the Parkland shooting, including Walmart.


http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/ ... un-control





Image
Image
Don’t let the Trump administration put clean car standards in reverse

Here we go again.

The Trump administration, bent on rolling back safeguards that keep Americans safe and protect consumers, is accelerating its reckless deregulatory push to undo vehicle standards at the behest of the automakers.

It’s déjà vu. I am reminded of my time as administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under President Jimmy Carter. At every turn we were met by automakers which — incorrectly — claimed that incorporating safety features like seatbelts and airbags was too costly.

Their most recent target: fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles, known as clean car standards.
Today’s program is the result of a historic 2011 agreement between automakers and the Obama administration. It would nearly double fuel economy by 2025 and reduce 6 billion metric tons of climate pollution over the lifetime of new vehicles sold between model years 2017 and 2025.

Since the agreement took effect, the standards have saved consumers money, protected public health and led to impressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Though monumental, the Obama-era clean car standards weren’t without precedent. As NHTSA administrator, I issued the country’s first fuel economy standards. These standards have been saving gas and saving consumers money since 1978 — 1.5 trillion gallons and $4 trillion. It’s gratifying to see what the industry can achieve.

However, ever since the 1970s, when consumer and health advocates began pushing for improved emissions standards, automakers have tried to thwart those attempts. It took more than 25 years for fuel economy standards to be updated, in no small part because of the automakers’ sabotage.

So here we are again. Just days after the 2016 election, automakers asked then President-elect Donald Trump to review the clean car standards. After multiple meetings with auto executives, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt announced plans to roll back the clean car standards. According to a review from the Environmental Defense Fund, that decision relies not on an EPA analysis of the standards but on 63 citations from the auto industry. Pruitt’s decision makes no mention of climate change — which was one of the key underlying rationales for the standards when they were issued.

Now, NHTSA and the EPA will begin to disassemble the clean car standards. It’s easy to predict what scare tactics they might use. In the 1990s, when Congress was considering improving fuel economy, the U.S. Department of Transportation claimed that greater fuel economy would produce less safe vehicles, a claim that belied the facts.

In reality, the vast majority of improvements to fuel economy came from improvements in technology, not by making vehicles that are less crashworthy. Nevertheless, efforts to torpedo improved fuel economy standards were successful for years.

Pruitt recently hinted in public comments that the administration would turn to refuted claims that fuel-efficient vehicles are less safe, don’t be fooled. Improved economy and improved safety are achievable together. Automakers have done it before. Now, they are producing the most technologically advanced and cleanest cars in history. Vehicle prices have stayed relatively flat, and automakers have seen profits boom.

A 2016 technical assessment by the EPA, NHTSA and the California Air Resources Board shows that automakers are meeting the standards more affordably and faster than predicted. According to an analysis by the Consumer Federation of America, many models already exceed the current Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) requirements.

The Obama standards push automakers to innovate and set mile-per-gallon targets based on vehicle size and not a fleet-wide average. This means that improved fuel economy will continue to come not only from improved technology in engines but also from advancements in metal alloys and composite materials that make modern cars stronger, safer and more fuel-efficient. This attack would be just the latest from an administration that misleads the public with no compunction.

The truth is that this administration isn’t pursuing regulatory rollbacks to help the American people. It is furiously undoing important safeguards at the behest of corporations and their friends who fill the highest posts in the Trump administration.

Automobiles on the road today demonstrate that increased safety and better fuel economy are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they are compatible and what the public wants.

Automakers should go forward, not backward. They should embrace the words of Robert B. Alexander, Ford’s then-vice president for car product development, which I often repeated to auto executives during my time as NHTSA administrator. In a 1977 speech sponsored by the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, he said, “The lion’s share of the burden of meeting these stringent standards and mandates will fall on the shoulders of the engineers. In fact, I like to call this the ‘age of the engineer’ — and I, for one, couldn’t be happier.” This statement is as true today was it was then.


http://thehill.com/opinion/energy-envir ... andards-in





Image
Image
Do Trump's tweets contaminate 9/11 trial? War court judge to decide.

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, CUBA

President Donald Trump's incendiary remarks about military justice stirred a dramatic exchange in a hearing Thursday for the accused conspirators of the 9/11 attacks, with defense lawyers arguing that the commander-in-chief exerted unlawful influence.

At issue are Trump's remarks on Twitter and in person about the decision to give no prison time to Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl and to urge the death penalty on a man who had not yet been charged for driving a van through a New York City bike path, killing eight people.

An attorney for alleged 9/11 plotter Khalid Sheik Mohammed urged the judge, Army Col. James Pohl, to remove the death penalty from consideration, if not dismiss the case altogether.

Prosecutor Bob Swann countered that that some people don't really pay attention to Trump's commentary and that the jury of U.S. military officers will decide the case based on other issues.

But defense attorney David Nevin said the military jury will understand that, in the instance of the New York City attack, "The commander-in-chief is telling them the result that he wants here, that is a death penalty."

The judge himself — the longest serving military judge in the Army — appeared to take particular offense over Trump's criticism of the sentence rendered by another military judge in the Bergdahl case. "The President of the United States, the commander-in-chief, feels necessary to criticize a colonel of the United States Army for a decision that we all know he's empowered to make," Pohl said.

One episode that defense lawyers cast as unlawful influence involved the president saying after 29-year-old Sayfullo Saipov rammed his vehicle Oct. 31 into the lower Manhattan bike path that he had changed his mind about sending the Uzbek immigrant to Guantánamo and favored a federal trial instead because he'd get swifter justice in civilian court. Trump also tweeted that the Uzbek should get the death penalty............


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation- ... Row1_card1





Image
Image
Energy Sec. Rick Perry’s son owns an energy investment company. Is that a problem?

WASHINGTON

A private investment firm led by Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s son has notified the Securities and Exchange Commission that it’s seeking investors for a new energy fund, raising concerns about the potential for private businesses run by the offspring of high-ranking government officials to benefit from their parents’ policy decisions without the public being aware.

Griffin Perry is one of three owners of Dallas-based Grey Rock Energy Partners, which runs pooled investment funds that take stakes in active U.S. oil and natural gas drilling projects on behalf of wealthy investors who can meet a hefty minimum investment threshhold.

On April 19, the SEC published Grey Rock’s latest regulatory filing, which created Grey Rock Energy Fund III-B. It marked the first new fund the group is offering since Griffin Perry’s father became President Donald Trump’s energy secretary, and comes amid escalating concerns about conflicts of interest in the Trump administration.

Watchdog groups have two worries about situations like this. One is that existing investment rules allow for little public disclosure about private funds like Grey Rock, making possible conflicts of interest nearly impossible to spot. Neither the names of the investors nor their individual stakes are shared with the SEC, which requires just minimal information on the number of investors and sum of investment money under management.

The other concern is that conflict-of-interest rules for politicians extend only to spouses and young kids, not grown ones.

“The criminal conflict-of-interest statute draws a bright-line distinction between adult child and minor child,” said Walter Shaub, who until February 2017 ran the federal Office of Government Ethics............


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation- ... Row5_card1





Image
Image
Comey blasts Giuliani for comparing FBI agents to 'stormtroopers'

Former FBI Director James Comey on Thursday rebuked Rudy Giuliani, a member of President Donald Trump's legal team, for referring to bureau officials as “stormtroopers,” saying U.S. leaders should be emulating federal law-enforcement officias “rather than comparing them to Nazis.”

During an interview Wednesday on Fox News, Giuliani blasted an FBI raid of the offices and home of Trump's longtime personal attorney, Michael Cohen. Giuliani framed the seizure of documents as a disproportionate action in the FBI investigation into Cohen‘s payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who says she was paid to keep quiet about a sexual encounter with Trump.

Giuliani characterized the raids as “big stormtroopers coming in and breaking down his apartment and breaking down his office.” The remark appeared to reference a paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party — known as the Sturmabteilung, or Storm Detachment — that played a role in the rise of Adolf Hitler.

Comey pushed back against the remarks.

“I know the New York FBI. There are no ‘stormtroopers’ there; just a group of people devoted to the rule of law and the truth,” Comey tweeted. “Our country would be better off if our leaders tried to be like them, rather than comparing them to Nazis.”..........


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... ani-566108





Image
Image
Trump's fixers revolt

Longtime associates whose job was to clean up messes are suddenly in the spotlight making things worse for the president.


Looking the part has always mattered to President Donald Trump.

The president’s preference for people who look like they came from “central casting” has become a well-known part of how Trump makes personnel decisions. The president said as much when he nominated Ronny Jackson — the square-jawed White House physician with a full head of hair thick enough to hold a side part — to be secretary of Veterans Affairs.

But behind the scenes, there’s another set of characters who populate Trump’s world: loyal fixers who lie for Trump, and clean up his messes in the shadows, where their looks count less than their loyalty.

It’s a dichotomy that’s well-known in Trump’s inner circle. One former adviser described it succinctly:

“Central casting for ‘front porch’ jobs, trolls for the real work.”


But in recent weeks, there has been tension in the natural order of Trump’s world, because his not-made-for-prime-time “fixers” have been basking in the national spotlight where they don’t belong. And they’re doing something else very out of character for the aides picked solely for their loyalty and willingness to bend the rules: They’re falling out of line.

This week, it’s Harold Bornstein, Trump’s long-haired, leather-skinned New York physician, who told CNN that he allowed Trump to dictate a letter about his health that was released during the campaign under Bornstein’s name.

“People like Dr. Bornstein and others are certainly unique-looking,” said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump campaign aide. “The reason the president hires them, or uses them, is because generally they’re not going to be in the public eye. They’re yes men.”

The behind-the-scenes crew also includes Michael Cohen, Trump’s longtime lawyer and all-around fixer, who personally made payments to silence a porn actress who claims to have had an affair with his boss—but who has declined to join the president in attacking the FBI agents who recently raided his home and office, instead describing them as “professional.”

In the past, Trump’s fixers have always endured poor treatment from the boss they aim to please: They are used to being taken for granted enduring personal insults without too much talking back.

“Bornstein was useful to Trump because he would do whatever he was told,” said a second longtime Trump confidant. “He understood that the key to Trump was doing anything he ordered you to do. Cohen and Bornstein both met that criteria.

That was then.

Bornstein, who like Cohen, at one point harbored hopes of following his client to White House, burst out of the shadows, and out of line, when he told NBC News on Tuesday that longtime Trump bodyguard Keith Schiller (another critical behind-the-scenes fixer) and two other men raided his office to seize the president’s medical files.

The incident, which he believes was instigated by his admission to the New York Times that the president uses the hair regrowth drug Propecia, left him feeling “raped, frightened and sad,” he said.............


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... ein-566006





Image
Image
Why Marco Rubio keeps attacking the tax bill he voted into law

The full transcript of Rubio’s tax policy remarks in an interview with the Economist are telling.


Frustrated with the media coverage of Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) viral critique of the Republican tax bill, Rubio’s office has published the rest of the senator’s comments, which are still a scathing critique of the law.

In newly published remarks, Rubio undercuts the true impact of the corporate tax cut, the central part of the Republican tax reform package, and seemingly questions his Republican colleagues’ dedication to helping the working class.

“I had no problem with cutting the corporate rate,” he said in the interview with the Economist. “I just felt that we could have cut it a lot, to 22 to 21, and use that extra point as a tax cut, but instead of for the multinationals, applied it to working families making $50,000 to $60,000 a year. ... And we did some of it, but the fact that we had to fight so hard to achieve it and the arguments that were used against it showed me how far we have to go.”

Rubio who voted for the final package after winning a slightly more generous child tax credit, said there are a lot of “net positives” in the new tax bill; however, he repeatedly gave a harsh assessment of the biggest reform: the massive corporate tax cut.

The tax law gives corporations a huge permanent tax cut, lowering the rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, which Republicans argue will push corporations to invest more in the United States, raise wages, increase jobs, and unleash unprecedented economic growth. As Vox explained, there isn’t too much evidence to this effect, and workers would only receive a quarter or less of the benefits from tax cuts — and among those workers, it’s likely the higher earners who would benefit.

Originally, Republicans tried to bring the rate down even more, to 20 percent. Lessening that reduction by even a mere 1 percent, to have more revenue for other reforms like Rubio’s child tax credit, was a “massive” fight, Rubio said.

“We, at one point, proposed a corporate rate of 20.9 percent to be able to fully do what we wanted,” Rubio said. “We did the .9 just to show the absurdity of it. And it was a massive fight because at the end of the day there was still a lot of thinking on the right of center that if Apple is happy and the big corporations are happy, they are going to take the money they are saving and reinvest it back into American workers.”

Rubio argued that while there might be more investment because of the Republican reforms, it’s not because of the corporate tax cut, but because of a different provision in tax law that allows companies to write off their investments the year that they’re made (also known as full expensing).

The backstory of Rubio’s office publishing the entirety of the senator’s Economist interview is mostly an insider tale of reporting on Congress. In short, one of Rubio’s comments critiquing the tax bill in the Economist interview was picked up by multiple national outlets (including Vox). Rubio wrote an op-ed in National Review to clarify that he thought the tax bill was good on the whole and “helps workers,” which Politico described as him “walking back” his comments to the Economist. Rubio’s office claimed this was the senator’s position all along (Rubio called out Politico on Twitter for the article being written by an intern), and because Politico wouldn’t run a correction, it published the transcript of the tax portion of Rubio’s interview with the Economist.

All of that is kind of beside the point. What’s interesting is that this entire drama and the transcript of Rubio’s comments go just as far to dismantle the signature Republican legislative accomplishment in the past year as the original viral remark did.

The full transcript of Rubio’s interview with the Economist on the tax bill, as released by his office, is below:


RUBIO: We, at one point, proposed a corporate rate of 20.9% to be able to fully do what we wanted. We did the .9 just to show the absurdity of it. And it was a massive fight because at the end of the day there was still a lot of thinking on the right of center that if Apple is happy and the big corporations are happy, they are going to take the money they are saving and reinvest it back into American workers. When in fact they bought back shares — they’ll invest in automation and productivity that way – a few of them gave out bonuses in the short term, but there’s no evidence whatsoever that this was massively poured back into the American worker.

I still think there are a lot of net positives of tax reform, let there be no doubt. I do think a lot of small businesses will now expand and immediately invest. But that had less to do with the rate, and more to do with the immediate expensing component of it. It had more to do with that than it did with the corporate rate.

I was not a big a fan of slashing massively the taxes of multinational corporations who aren’t even American companies. We shouldn’t be discriminatory towards them, but we don’t have any special obligation towards them either. These are citizens of the world…

The problem is that growth as I said, if you’re a multinational corporation, you may be growing but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s helping Americans. Your shareholders are from all over the world, your customers are from all over the world, your supply chain, and your production chain may not even be in the United States. The idea that massive growth by some large entity that is a multinational footprint is going to somehow benefit Americans especially because they happen to be headquartered in the United States --

THE ECONOMIST: So you were unhappy with the tax reform because of the cuts to the corporate rate?

RUBIO: I had no problem with cutting the corporate rate. I had proposed a cut myself. I just felt that we could have cut it a lot, to 22 to 21, and use that extra point as a tax cut, but instead of for the multinationals, applied it to working families making $50,000 to $60,000 a year. It wouldn’t have changed their lives, but would have shown we care. And we did some of it, but the fact that we had to fight so hard to achieve it and the arguments that were used against it showed me how far we have to go.


https://www.vox.com/2018/5/3/17314984/m ... p-tax-bill





Image
Image
BREAKING From Trump’s ‘Doctors’: Most Remarkable Physical Specimen of All Time!

At 7 feet tall, 200 lbs. and 0% body fat, Donald John Trump is the healthiest president—indeed, head of state of any kind—ever. Oh, and he has huge hands.


A Memo On The President’s Health

By Drs. David Dennison, John Barron, and John Miller

This letter is to certify Donald Trump’s continued robust good health, genius-plus level intellect, and physical perfection. As America’s healthiest President (and many people are saying) the healthiest human being in the world, Mr. Trump is a golden Adonis, a specimen of masculinity so perfect that in the annals of medical science we have been unable to find anyone who can rival him.

At 7 feet tall, Mr. Trump is our tallest President, and at just 200 lbs, with body fat of 0%, he is undoubtedly the fittest President, or indeed sovereign or head or state of any kind, in world history. While Mr. Trump is 70 years old, we assess his physical condition to be that of a 25-year-old elite athlete. His dedication to triathlons, daily weight training, and heavy cardio leaves his cadre of former Navy SEAL physical trainers shaking and exhausted, awed by his sheer endurance and power. As one told us during the preparation of this report, “Mr. Trump could easily complete BUDS/S tomorrow, then do the SFAS course simultaneously with the USAF Pararescue program, and then pass SERE with flying colors.”

Mr. Trump has definitely, positively never, ever, ever had gonorrhea, herpes, syphilis, chlamydia, the French, Spanish, or English pox, crabs, genital lice, crotch-crickets, Bulgarian junk-rot, the Weeping Cobra, the Gift that Keeps On Giving, Studio 54 Stall Surprise, or Bangkok Fire-Dick. Mr. Trump’s noted fidelity to his wives should put to rest all of these scurrilous rumors. In fact, our laboratory research shows that contact with Mr. Trump’s magnificent body kills all forms of STDs, and also cures scrofula, vertigo, blindness, sleep apnea, and the Jimmy Leg.

Mr. Trump’s daily routine is a model of health, not only for a President but for any American. Each day, Mr. Trump makes America great for eight hours, performs 10 hours of cardio, including strenuous golf-cart riding, hand cardio (Tweeting), and reporter haranguing. He then makes vigorous love to Mrs. Trump for five hours, sleeps one hour and repeats the process.

Mr. Trump’s mental acuity transcends even the most aggressive projections for the far future of Singularity-level Artificial Intelligences. His ability to consume volumes of complex intelligence materials in minutes leaves his staff in constant awe. Mr. Trump often demands his briefers present the original intel source material to him untranslated, since his ability to speak 124 languages is unrivaled.


When testing Mr. Trump’s mental fitness, we discovered he had not only memorized the Code of Federal Regulations but could extemporaneously recite it in the form of a medieval French chanson de geste.

Mr. Trump’s astounding power to understand and rectify complex, multivariate regulatory problems would be a bright display of his status as the most intelligent President ever. Even knowing he was one of the most brilliant men in recorded history, his work on advanced string theory, quantum chromodynamics, and fusion containment is beyond our understanding as mere medical men. Far from deserving just the Nobel Peace Prize, it is our humble opinion that Mr. Trump deserves Nobel Prizes in Literature, Economics, Chemistry, Physics, Medicine, and Making America Great Again.

His eyesight is so keen he can spot the panty line on an adult film actress from a half-mile. Mr. Trump’s night vision is so acute he can read the text of a non-disclosure agreement printed in 4-point type in near-total darkness. The National Reconnaissance Office has asked the President to allow them to make a model of his eyes to develop the next generation of surveillance satellite optics.

Mr. Trump’s hearing is so acute that he can discern the faintest dog whistles and can detect any aspersions, insults, or questions regarding his character from miles away. In moments where Mr. Trump is seemingly unable to hear questions, his son-in-law Jared is happy to whisper in his ear, especially regarding his White House rivals.

Mr. Trump’s genes display qualities heretofore unknown to science. They are, to use a term of scientific art, bigly superior. Careful analysis reveals that Mr. Trump’s genetic sequences contain not only DNA and RNA, but also TNA, or Trump Nucleic Acids. TNA binds to gold leaf, golf greens, trophy wives, and self-regard. Although it is out of the purview of this report, we believe the only solution to the plague of Antifa Super-Soldiers threatening America is a clone army based on Mr. Trump’s gloriously perfect and unique genetic makeup.


His hands are so very large that other President’s hands are like those of tiny, tiny dolls by comparison. Believe us. We measured them with extraordinary scientific rigor. Our super-doctory scientific tests reveal that Mr. Trump’s hands are also very, very strong. The President can crush a titanium ingot like a marshmallow. He can palm bowling balls, and throw them over a mile without breaking a sweat. He has often carried weights heavier than any other President, ever.

Mr. Trump’s hair is thick, fast-growing, and retains its natural golden hue from his youth. His skin is that of a teenage farmgirl; smooth, taut, perfectly free of any wrinkles, moles, blemishes, wens, cystic formations, or signs of a lifetime of fast-food addiction, rough living, whoring, or long nights spent in the humid darkness of a low-rent Atlantic City casino.

Even for a man of Mr. Trump’s astounding health, constitution, physical perfection, and genetic gifts, life is not without challenges.

Mr. Trump’s body emits a thick musk of pure testosterone, causing men near him to become aggressive, and women to strip off their clothes and beg him to grab them by their reproductive organs. This powerful scent is a constant challenge to the Secret Service, as battalions of scantily-clad women wearing little but MAGA hats and thong panties throw themselves at the President, forming human pyramids to scale security fences and showing up in attorney Michael Cohen’s office demanding $130,000 payments.

Mr. Trump’s manhood is, as you will be unsurprised to learn, is the largest of any President, and in fact, larger than any mammalian penis outside that of the majestic blue whale. His genitals require a system of complex straps, buckles, pulleys, trusses, and velcro attachment points to contain them within his custom-fitted trousers.

As his very real physicians (who many people say are the best medical experts from the best schools ever, and totally not the pen names of an insecure man consumed by his petty vanities and insecurities) we certify the preceding to be really, really true.

Dr. David Dennison

Dr. John Barron

Dr. John Miller


https://www.thedailybeast.com/breaking- ... e?ref=home












Image
Image
Anderson Cooper Briefly Speechless When GOP Strategist Swears He’s Never Heard Trump Lie

“Wow,” he finally said.


Anderson Cooper was momentarily stunned speechless when a top GOP strategist insisted he had never heard President Donald Trump tell a lie.

“The president’s never lied to me and I don’t think the president’s lied to the American people,” insisted former Trump campaign strategist David Urban on CNN’s “Anderson Copper 360” Wednesday. “I think the president is prone to hyperbole, yes, absolutely. Do I think he’s purposefully misleading the American people? No, I don’t.”

Cooper simply stared into the camera for seconds before responding: “Wow. Wow. Okay. I am not sure I believe ... that’s what you really believe ... Factually, he has said things which are not true, and which he obviously knows are not true.”

Urban stuck to his story even when Cooper pointed out findings by The Washington Post earlier this week that Trump has lied or misconstrued facts more than 3,000 times in 466 days — “6.5 false claims a day.” Cooper added: “You’re saying you’ve never heard the president say something which is demonstrably false and he knew was false?”

Urban laughed: “You’re asking me my opinion.”

Trump acknowledged Thursday that he had reimbursed his personal attorney Michael Cohen for a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels after insisting he knew nothing about it.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/an ... fd2d24a7b1





Image
Image
Giuliani Calls Comey A ‘Baby’ For Defending FBI Agents Against ‘Storm Trooper’ Insult

Agents are “devoted to the rule of law,” the former FBI director said.


Rudy Giuliani lashed former FBI Director James Comey as a “sensitive little baby” Thursday after Comey defended the bureau’s agents after Giuliani called them “storm troopers,” The Washington Post reported.

Among a number of stunning comments by Giuliani in his Fox News interview Wednesday night, he compared FBI agents to Nazi storm troopers for raiding the office of President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen last month and collecting documents and computers. Agents, provided with court-issued warrants, were legally authorized to do so. Cohen is being investigated for bank fraud and possible campaign finance violations.

Comey tweeted Thursday that there are no “stormtroopers” in the FBI — “just a group of people devoted to the rule of law and the truth.” Comey said the country would be better off if “our leaders” tried to emulate them instead of “comparing them to Nazis.”


Giuliani, who just joined Trump’s legal team, responded to the tweet in an interview with The Washington Post, calling Comey a “sensitive little baby.”

He added, without offering details: “He should be sensitive, because he’s been caught lying over and over again.”

Bolstering his growing reputation as Trump’s new insult man, Giuliani on Fox also called Comey a “disgraceful liar” and “very perverted man” — again, without explaining what he was referring to.

In defending Trump on Fox, Giuliani appeared to support suspicions that the president fired Comey a year ago to short-circuit an investigation into possible collusion between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign to swing the election in Trump’s favor.

Giuliani said the president “fired Comey because Comey would not — among other things — say that he wasn’t a target of the investigation.” So “he fired him and he said, ‘I’m free of this guy.’”

Giuliani has traditionally enjoyed strong ties with the FBI, both as a U.S. attorney and as New York City mayor. After Comey reopened the investigation into Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails just before the election, Giuliani indicated he learned that members of the bureau weren’t happy with the initial conclusion to not pursue her use of a private email server from both former and “active” agents.


Giuliani’s former law firm, then called Bracewell & Giuliani, was also general counsel to the FBI Agents Association, which represents 13,000 current and former agents. Giuliani left the firm in early 2016.

( TERRIFIC - ANOTHER MORON - ANOTHER LOOSE CANNON IN THE WHITE HOUSE - WHEN DOES IT ALL END :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: )

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gi ... fd2d249c87





Image
Image
Fox's Cavuto on pattern of false statements: 'Mr. President, that’s your swamp'

Fox News host Neil Cavuto on Thursday scolded President Trump for making contradictory statements about a payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, calling the president’s habit of making inaccurate statements his “swamp.”

“Let me be clear, Mr. President. How can you drain the swamp if you’re the one that keeps muddying the waters? You didn’t know about the $130,000 payment to a porn star until you did,” Cavuto said.


“You said you knew nothing about your lawyer Michael Cohen handling this, until acknowledging today you were the guy behind the retainer payment that took care of this,” he continued. “You insist that money from the campaign or campaign contributions played no role in this transaction. Of that you’re sure. The thing is, not 24 hours ago, sir, you couldn’t recall any of this. And you seemed very sure.”

]“I’m not saying you’re a liar,” Cavuto added. “You’re a president, you’re busy. I’m having a devil of a time figuring out which news is fake. Let’s just say that your own words on lots of stuff gave me lots of pause."


Cavuto then ran through a long list of claims that Trump has made that have later been proven to be false or were inaccurate or unsubstantiated in the first place.

Among the items were Trump’s claims that Russians didn’t interfere in the 2016 election, that the new GOP tax law would cost him a “fortune” and that he had signed more bills at that point of his presidency than any of his predecessors.

“None of this makes what you say fake. Just calling out the press for being so, a bit of a stretch,” Cavuto said.

“But more oftentimes they’re using your own words to bash you. Your base probably might not care. But you should,” he continued. “I guess you’re too busy draining the swamp to ever stop and smell the stink you’re creating. That’s your doing. That’s your stink, Mr. President, that’s your swamp.”


Cavuto’s commentary came one day after Rudy Giuliani, a member of Trump's personal legal team, revealed on Fox News that Trump had reimbursed his longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen for a payment to Daniels despite Trump previously denying knowing about the payment.

Trump offered his explanation for the payment in a series of tweets early Thursday, saying that Cohen was reimbursed for the payment through a retainer.


http://thehill.com/homenews/media/38617 ... your-swamp

Re: Politics

Posted: Mon May 07, 2018 11:04 pm
by joez
Image
Image
4 women accuse New York attorney general of physical abuse

NEW YORK (AP) — Four women who have had romantic relationships with New York’s attorney general have accused him of physically abusing them.

Two of the women spoke on record to The New Yorker , which published their claims against Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (SHNEYE’-dur-muhn) on Monday.

Michelle Manning Barish and Tanya Selvaratnam say Schneiderman repeatedly hit them, often after drinking, and without their consent.

Selvaratnam says the Democrat warned her he could have her followed or her phones tapped. Both say he threatened to kill them if they broke up with him.

A Schneiderman spokesman says he never made any threats. In a statement, Schneiderman says he engaged in “role-playing and other consensual sexual activity,” but did not assault anyone.

The Associated Press is identifying the two women who spoke to The New Yorker because they agreed to tell their stories publicly.


https://www.apnews.com/015d637182274eed ... ical-abuse





Image
Image
As headlines swirl, Trump grows frustrated with Giuliani

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump is growing increasingly irritated with lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s frequently off-message media blitz, in which he has muddied the waters on hush money paid to porn actress Stormy Daniels and made claims that could complicate the president’s standing in the special counsel’s Russia probe.

Trump has begun questioning whether Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, should be sidelined from television interviews, according to two people familiar with the president’s thinking but not authorized to speak publicly about private discussions.

Trump also expressed annoyance that Giuliani’s theatrics have breathed new life into the Daniels story and extended its lifespan. It’s a concern shared by Trump allies who think Giuliani is only generating more legal and political trouble for the White House.

Giuliani, the newest addition to the president’s legal team, first rattled the White House last week when he sat for interviews on Fox News and seemed to contradict Trump’s previous statements by saying the president was aware of the October 2016 payout to Daniels from his personal attorney, Michael Cohen. He also suggested the settlement with Daniels had been made because Trump was in the stretch run of his presidential campaign.

After Trump chided Giuliani on Friday, saying the lawyer needed to “get his facts straight,” the former mayor put out a statement trying to clarify his remarks. But in weekend interviews, Giuliani appeared to dig himself a deeper hole by acknowledging that “Cohen takes care of situations like this, then gets paid for them sometimes.” He did not rule out the possibility that Cohen had paid off other women.

Trump, who has denied the affair with Daniels, was angry that Giuliani had given the impression that other women may make similar charges of infidelity, according to the people familiar with his views.

Additionally, Trump has grown agitated in recent days by cable news replays of Giuliani’s Wednesday interview with Sean Hannity, in which he first said that Trump knew about the payment but claimed it wouldn’t be a campaign violation. A clearly surprised Hannity then asked, “Because they funneled it through the law firm?”

To which Giuliani responded, “Funneled it through the law firm, and the president repaid him.”

Trump snapped at both men in recent days, chiding Hannity for using the word “funneled,” which he believes had illegal connotations, according to the people. As for Giuliani, the president has not yet signaled to him to stop appearing on television, but told a confidant recently that perhaps his new lawyer should “be benched” at least temporarily, if he can’t improve his performance.............


https://www.apnews.com/1ad738724df84c90 ... h-Giuliani





Image
Image
Trump’s trade war is pushing China and Japan closer together

Japan has long taken a hawkish stance against China's growing influence, but the Asian rivals have recently been working to thaw their relationship after years of tension— in large part because both fear Trump's trade war.

The big picture: The Japanese "still fundamentally see China as the greatest threat to Japan, and they're still deeply reliant on the security relationship with the U.S. [in the East China Sea], but they're hedging," Dan Sneider, an expert on East Asia at Stanford University, tells Axios. "They're accepting the reality that China's going to be a major power, and they also have to hedge against the uncertainty of American foreign policy."

The moves

China is considering rolling back an import ban on agriculture, forestry and fisheries products that was put in place due to health concerns stemming from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, reports the Nikkei Asian Review.

"Tokyo ... is set to display a cooperative stance toward [President Xi Jinping's] Belt and Road infrastructure initiative," per the Review.

That'd be a big shift — Japan has not been shy in voicing its concerns about Xi's plan to the international community.

Japan has also warmed to China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, after pointedly refusing to join two years ago.

And the two countries are discussing setting up a military hotline to prevent escalation of activity in the East China Sea.

The two countries are back to engaging in high-level dialogue.

Last month, as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was meeting with President Trump in Mar-a-Lago, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi was in Tokyo leading the first "high-level economic summit" between the two countries in 8 years.

Wang said, "The two sides should safeguard economic globalization and free trade system," per Chinese state media.

Top diplomats from China, Japan and South Korea are also set to hold a trilateral meeting for the first time since 2015 on Wednesday.

Xi and Abe had their first ever phone call on Friday to discuss developments on the Korean peninsula. They have spoken in person in the past.

The backdrop: The warming of Sino-Japanese relations is not sudden, but it's certainly accelerating amid trade fears and diplomacy with North Korea, Sneider says.

The Trump factor

President Trump's alienation of Japan on trade has Tokyo questioning whether it can rely on the U.S. to help it counter China's influence.

Japan was disappointed to see President Trump pull the U.S. out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Japanese took the lead on keeping the deal alive because Tokyo sees the TPP as its key tool to fight China, namely Belt and Road.

Trump also did not exempt Japan from U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs, which came as a shock to Tokyo — and pushed the Japanese toward resetting relations with Beijing.

What China is thinking

China overtook Japan as Asia's biggest economy in 2010 and, since then, Beijing has set the terms of engagement between the two countries, "declining Tokyo's requests to resume the [high-level economic] dialogue for years," per the Review.

But this time, China was the one to approach Japan about revisiting their economic alliance.

Japanese investment remains a major factor in the Chinese economy. And if the U.S. closes its market to China, Japan will become an even more crucial economic ally.

Go deeper: Japan maneuvers the Trump presidency ... China courts European allies in trade war ... Japan could be collateral damage in a trade fight


https://www.axios.com/trump-trade-war-s ... 66cea.html





Image
Image
China Is Quietly Setting Global Standards

A little-noticed effort could be a very big deal.


High-level trade talks last week between the U.S. and China grabbed headlines around the world, but in many ways they were beside the point. In the years ahead, tariffs and industrial policy — the main focus of the talks — will probably matter less in the growing competition between the two countries, while another, much quieter initiative will matter more.

As China boosts overseas investment through its Belt and Road infrastructure program, it is increasingly dictating not just the terms of financing but also a broader set of technological applications. In doing so, it is altering the global competitive landscape by defining and exporting technical standards for everything from artificial intelligence to hydropower.

This push into global standards-setting has gone largely unnoticed. That's partly because it's boring: Even broaching the topic will make investors' eyes glaze over, and few Western governments have given it much thought.

But it's also partly by design. The process has so far mostly unfolded domestically, and in Chinese, as China's government has sought to develop its own set of industrial standards for companies operating within its borders. That has made the effort mostly opaque to outsiders. Yet regulators are now starting to translate those standards into English — a clear sign that they're meant to be exported overseas. And that should worry China's competitors.

For decades, America's ability to set domestic standards that would then spread globally benefited its economy greatly. As a recent paper by the East-West Center put it, "Standards serve as bridges between developing innovations and the marketization and industrialization of those innovations." The specification of even everyday items such as USB ports has given American companies a strong advantage in selling goods in other markets.

Patents are the key conduit of this process. As standard-setting in any industry progresses, the companies that own the technology on which the standards are based benefit by either selling their equipment or licensing their patents. Telecoms are a classic example. Qualcomm Inc., which owns key patents for LTE, 3G, and 4G technology, has received billions of dollars in royalties in recent years — including almost $8 billion in China alone in 2014. And that's in an industry where standards are set through a complex global process; when countries set standards unilaterally, the benefits for their homegrown companies can be even more pronounced.

This is where President Xi Jinping's signature foreign-policy program comes in. Most analyses of the Belt and Road initiative focus on whether individual projects will become profitable or will leave China further mired in debt. Yet the return on investment for a port in Sri Lanka or a rail line in Thailand matters less to Chinese officials than the ability to push participating countries to adopt Chinese standards on everything from construction to finance to data management. For just one example, China is exporting key technical standards for the construction of high-speed rail through these projects — in large part to circumvent standards set by Western players.

Developing countries tend to voluntarily adopt standards set by high-income economies. But China's government has taken a much more proactive role. Instead of trying to influence the likes of Pakistan, Thailand, and Myanmar by changing hearts and minds, it wants to convince them to change their nuts and bolts — and their data-management practices to boot. In this context, China's recent revisions to its National Standardization Law and its Cyber Security Law look far more significant; they could reverberate far beyond its borders.

Although few people would contest China's right to determine its own technological standards, exporting those standards is another matter altogether. Billions of dollars in equipment sales and patent royalties are up for grabs in this competition. To the extent that China's standards supplant Western ones, it will represent a direct threat to the profitability of non-Chinese companies.

This push won't directly challenge the ability of American or European companies to innovate. But it will undoubtedly challenge their ability to commercialize technology in other markets. That emerging competition should be of utmost concern to companies and policy makers alike — and that's one reason China is glad that the issue isn't even part of the discussion.


https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... -standards





Image
Image
Melania Trump recycles FTC tips for anti-cyberbullying push

The most striking thing about anti-cyberbullying tips released by Melania Trump Monday was just how much was taken straight from a 2014 FTC pamphlet (under the Obama Administration). Reporters and bloggers immediately seized on the similarities, which included a near-identical cover and almost verbatim passages.

Why it matters: The effort has been greeted with skepticism since it was announced, given the President's propensity to use his Twitter account to mock and pillory political opponents.

The guide, titled "Talking with Kids About Being Online," is very similar to the FTC's earlier "Net Cetera: Chatting with Kids about Being Online," though the former includes a foreword from the First Lady.

What they're saying: A White House spokeswoman said the pamphlet was released in partnership with the FTC, which has been very popular since it was released in 2009. It was updated and edited to reflect the First Lady's event.

The FTC today praised the First Lady in a blog post on the initiative: "We’re excited that the First Lady is sharing this important information with families across the country... Thank you for your leadership in protecting kids, Mrs. Trump."


https://www.axios.com/melania-trump-rec ... c9c52.html





Image
Image
(Two Hours After Melania Trumps Cyberbullying - Children First Push)

Children are likely to be separated from parents illegally crossing the border under new Trump administration policy :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


All immigrants who cross the border illegally will be charged with a crime under a new "zero tolerance" border enforcement policy, Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions said Monday, launching a crackdown that could overwhelm already-clogged detention facilities and immigration courts with hundreds of thousands of new cases.

Sessions also said that families who illegally cross the border may be separated after their arrest, with children sent to juvenile shelters while their parents are sent to adult detention facilities. Until now, border agents tried to keep parents and their children at the same detention site.

The new policy is expected to send a flood of deportation cases — and legal challenges — into federal courts. It also could put thousands more immigrants in detention facilities and children in shelters,
and is likely to strain an immigration system that has struggled to keep up with a surge in enforcement under President Trump. Until now, individuals apprehended while crossing illegally were often simply bused back over the border without charges. That was especially common for people without criminal records or previous immigration violations.

"This border is not open. Don't come unlawfully…. Make your claim. Wait your turn," Sessions said Monday, speaking to reporters at Border Field State Park, which straddles the U.S.-Mexico border near Imperial Beach in San Diego County. "We cannot let everyone in this planet who is in a difficult situation............."


http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-p ... story.html





Image
Image
Melania Trump Reused An Obama-Era Pamphlet For Her New Anti-Cyberbullying Campaign

First lady Melania Trump’s anti-cyberbullying campaign brochure was largely recycled from an Obama-era publication in 2014, with most of the material copied over verbatim.

On Monday, Trump launched her “Be Best” initiative to promote children’s health, focusing on well-being, social media and online activity, and opioid addiction. As part of that, she and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a 27-page document outlining her plan to help parents talk with their children about being safe online.

But the document copies almost word-for-word a FTC pamphlet published in January 2014 as part of the agency’s “Net Cetera” campaign, which began under President Obama in 2009. After tweaking some language and graphics and adding an introduction from the first lady, the White House uploaded the new document, “Talking With Kids About Being Online,” to its website as the only external resource for Trump’s new Be Best website.

Image


“As it is clearly related to the social media portion of Mrs. Trump’s initiatives, it is a good resource to include with some of our Be Best materials,” first lady spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham told BuzzFeed News. “It was updated and edited to reflect today’s event and we were happy to be able to provide the children in attendance with such a resource.”

But the updates appeared to be minimal, stoking concerns from online observers that Trump, who copied from Michelle Obama for her speech at the 2016 Republican National Convention, was again plagiarizing for her newest initiative. On the cover page, a graphic for a mobile phone was slightly altered to show a more modern device, while certain headlines were changed with no additions to the underlying content. The 2014 headline for discussion on “Sexting,” for example, was updated to read “Sexting: Don’t Do It” in the current version. The paragraph explainer that followed was exactly the same.


https://www.buzzfeed.com/blakemontgomer ... .udDZyPz46





Image
Image
BIGOTRY OF LOW EXPECTATIONS

The Damage of Trump’s Low-Bar Presidency Is Worse Than You Think

What will we come to expect of our elected leaders when he is gone?


We are so distracted every day by the latest Trump scandal that it becomes hard to recognize the collective damage being done by his presidency.

It’s not just the breaking of the norms. It’s is the massive lowering of expectations that people will have in their politicians and their governing institutions.

Take this past week. We were told three different story lines on one separate story after it was revealed—in a wholly separate matter—that Trump had dictated that glowing 2015 health report from his doctor.

But it’s more than just the misdirection and mistruths. It’s the cynicism that accompanies them. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) now says the Department of Veterans Affairs is unmanageable. “I’m not sure anyone can run the VA,” he confessed, as the nomination of Rear Adm. Ronny Jackson to head the department teetered in the balance. “It’s so big, it’s one of the biggest bureaucracies in the federal government.”

Meanwhile, President Trump says he thought the job would be easier and that nobody knew how complicated health care would be.

He has, in short order, created The Low-Bar Presidency, an administration in which we have grown to expect that the spokespeople mislead, that Cabinet officials are corrupt, and that the commander in chief is learning on the job.


Most of us are shocked in real time. But the existential question is whether the Low-Bar Presidency ends when Trump’s tenure does. Or will our expectations forever be lowered because of what he has managed to do less than 18 months into office? Will we assume, from here on out, that our politicians lie so cavalierly to us? That they misuse our taxpayer funds for the betterment of their private lives? That they are incapable of meeting the challenges of governance? If so, the costs could be horrifying.

A population that believes its elected representatives will fail them will stop demanding success, or truth, or competence, or ethics. We won’t throw the bums out. We’ll grow accustomed to living with them.

We’ve been through a crisis of confidence before—as recently as the 1970s. “Americans heard for years that the presidency had grown too complex for one person to manage, that the office had been crippled,” Time magazine’s Lance Morrow recalled in 1986, before adding that, “Reagan seems to slide through a presidential day with ease.”

But since the Gipper rode off into the sunset, we have reverted to form. Just last year, Jeremi Suri’s book, The Impossible Presidency: The Rise and Fall of America’s Highest Office, made this same argument. In the May 2018 edition of The Atlantic, John Dickerson did the same:. “No one man—or woman—can possibly represent the varied, competing interests of 327 million citizens,” he wrote.

Instead of giving presidents a pass for poor leadership, perhaps we should examine how one man did defy the doomsayers. As Morrow wrote, the fundamental reason Reagan defied the odds is simple: “Reagan seems to derive his strength from the fact that he does exactly what he says he will do.”

“He told the air-traffic controllers what he would do, for example, and when they persisted in their strike, he fired them and made it stick. All that has a tonic effect,” wrote Morrow.

Which brings us back to Trump. He doesn’t do what he says he’s going to do.

Whether it’s DACA or TPP or gun control—or sitting down with Robert Mueller or reimbursing Michael Cohen—he consistently has a casual relationship with the truth. Either that, or “his truth” keeps changing.


If it feels like a form of psychological manipulation, that’s because it is. As conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter’s new book argues, Trump is “Gaslighting America.” We’ve had our share of liars and incompetents in the Oval Office, but never before have we had a president so masterful at psychologically manipulating us and making us question our own perception of reality.

“The difference is that Clinton and Nixon used gaslighting to try and create this alternative reality as a defensive measure when they were caught doing something wrong,” Carpenter explains. “Trump is different on an extreme level because he does it offensively.”

The end result is a public that doesn’t trust its government to tell the truth—or have confidence that it can properly function. It is the Low-Bar Presidency. And not only does it rejigger our expectations and change our level of tolerance for this kind of behavior in real time, it also invites the next president (regardless of party) to act this way too down the road.

Call it normalizing bad behavior, or creating permission structure, if you will. We have broken the seal; the genie is out of the bottle.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-damag ... k?ref=home






Image
Image
O'Reilly says he offered to stand by Sanders during White House press briefings


Former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly says he offered to stand by White House press secretary Sarah Sanders during press briefings to help deal with "out of line" reporters.

O'Reilly revealed on his online show on Monday that made the remarks to Sanders at a party for new German Ambassador Richard Grinnell on Sunday.

"I said, 'Ms. Sanders with all due respect, if you ever need me to stand next to you in those press briefings, I will volunteer to do that. And, if somebody gets out of line, I will tell them exactly what I think of their behavior,' " O'Reilly said, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The former cable news host said he made an "honest offer," and that Sanders laughed in response to the proposal.

"She's representing her country in very difficult circumstances, extremely difficult, and she's a patriot — you know, she's taken enormous amount of abuse, enormous," O'Reilly said.

Last month Sanders, who has a sometimes contentious relationship with the press corps, found herself the subject of multiple jokes from White House Correspondents' Association dinner host Michelle Wolf.

"Every time Sarah steps up to the podium, I get excited. I'm not really sure what we're going to get, you know? A press briefing, a bunch of lies or divided into softball teams," Wolf said.

"I actually really like Sarah. I think she's very resourceful," Wolf added. "But she burns facts and then she uses that ash to create a perfect smokey eye. Like maybe she's born with it, maybe it's lies."

Sanders responded on Fox News earlier this month, saying, "I think that evening says a whole lot more about her than it does about me."


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... hite-house




Image
Image
Flake says he'll donate to Manchin if Blankenship wins primary


GOP Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) said on Monday that he will donate to Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin's campaign if ex-coal CEO Don Blankenship wins Tuesday's primary in West Virginia and becomes the GOP nominee.

"If he does [win the primary] I think you'll see a lot of Republicans making a contribution to Joe Manchin. I certainly will be," he told reporters on Monday.

Blankenship, who spent a year in prison for violating mine safety standards, has momentum heading into Tuesday's primary, with polling showing him pulling ahead of Rep. Evan Jenkins (R-W.Va.) and Attorney General Patrick Morrisey.


Flake's comments come after he came out against Blankenship on Monday. He also appeared to take a veiled swing at President Trump's decision to buck Blankenship because he couldn't win in November and not specifically for his controversial rhetoric.

"The problem isn't that Don Blankenship can't win a general election in West Virginia, it's that he shouldn't win a general election in West Virginia," Flake wrote on Twitter.

Trump took to Twitter early Monday morning to urge his supports to back either Jenkins or Morrisey.

But Flake argued that Trump should have more forcefully condemned Blankenship's controversial rhetoric. The former coal baron has drawn negative national headlines for attacks against McConnell's wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao. In one ad, Blankenship said McConnell had benefited from his "China family."

"He ought to condemn not just the loss of a seat but to say somebody like this that expresses those kind of views should not be supported by Republicans," Flake added on Monday.


http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/s ... ns-primary




Image
Image
Oliver North, Key Player In Iran-Contra Scandal, Named NRA President

The retired lieutenant colonel was tried over his role in the secret sale of arms to Iran in the 1980s.


Oliver North, a Fox News contributor who was a central figure in the Iran-Contra firearms scandal in the 1980s, has been named the National Rifle Association’s next president.

The retired lieutenant colonel in the Marine Corps is expected to take over for current NRA president and firearm businessman Pete Brownell within the next few weeks, the NRA said in a release on Monday.

Brownell, who served one year as president, is not seeking re-election “in order to devote his full time and energy to his family business,” the NRA said in a statement. Brownell is CEO of his family’s firearm accessory retailer, Brownells.

“Oliver North is a legendary warrior for American freedom, a gifted communicator and skilled leader,” NRA executive vice president and CEO Wayne LaPierre said in a statement. “In these times, I can think of no one better suited to serve as our President.”

North, in the NRA’s statement, said he is immediately retiring from Fox News and will take the next few weeks to ensure his business affairs are in order before he assumes responsibilities as the group’s president.

North previously served on the NRA’s board of directors and has been an outspoken supporter of the group. In 2010, he told a crowd: “I love speaking out for the NRA, in large part because it drives the left a little bit nuts.”

Before joining Fox News, North was the National Security Council staffer under President Ronald Reagan. He was famously found to have played a key role in the secret sale of arms to Iran, which was under an arms embargo at the time. Proceeds from the clandestine weapons sales were funneled to support terrorist efforts against Nicaragua’s socialist government.

North was convicted of three felonies for his role in the scandal, though those convictions were later vacated by an appeals court after it was determined that his immunized congressional testimony had been improperly used in his criminal trial.


North has also served as a consultant for a game in the hugely successful “Call of Duty” first-person shooter series. The NRA has repeatedly argued that this sort of virtual violence has contributed to a rise in mass shootings.

In 1994, North captured the Republican Party nomination for a Senate seat in Virginia. He was defeated by then-incumbent Sen. Chuck Robb (D-Va.).

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ol ... fd2d296cc1





Image
Image
Jake Tapper Says John McCain Not Wanting Donald Trump At Funeral Is ‘A Real Moment For The Country’

“Senator McCain is everything that President Trump is not,” S.E. Cupp said to Tapper.


Journalist and “State of the Union” host Jake Tapper said that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) not wanting President Donald Trump at his funeral is a “real moment for the country.”

During Sunday’s broadcast of “Union” on CNN, Tapper paused to talk about a recent report in The New York Times that McCain, 81, is making plans for the future as he fights aggressive brain cancer.

According to the report, McCain’s “intimates have informed the White House” that they plan to allow Vice President Mike Pence to attend McCain’s future funeral, but not President Trump.

“I want to change the subject for one second,” Tapper said on Sunday night. “This has been reported now in the The New York Times and elsewhere. The plan would be to have Mike Pence be the one to honor Senator McCain in hopefully long, long, long from now event of his demise. This is a real moment for the country where an American hero, somebody beloved in many, many ways is saying, ‘I don’t want this guy at my funeral.’”

Tapper also addressed McCain directly, saying that he’s “rooting” for the ailing “hero.” Along with serving as a senator since 1987, McCain is a Vietnam war veteran and was the 2008 Republican presidential candidate.

In 2015, Trump dismissed McCain’s experiences as a prisoner of war, saying he likes “people who weren’t captured.” Over the weekend, the president called the senator’s vote against health care reform “a bad vote” and “not a nice thing” in a speech to the NRA.

The discourse continued on “State of the Union” after Tapper’s comment. Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) said that he wasn’t particularly surprised by McCain’s feelings about Trump because the senator, Meeks said, is not a hypocrite.

“Senator McCain is known for being honest, just the opposite of Donald Trump, and frank. When someone would come up with something negative about President Obama, he corrected them,” said Meeks.

“And so, I wouldn’t expect anything to be different for Mr. McCain, Sen. McCain, now. He is not going to be a hypocrite. He does not believe that Donald Trump represents the kind of moral authority that the president of the United States should represent for our country and the rest of the world ... It would be a mischaracterization of who he is.”

Those sentiments were backed by “Unfiltered” host S.E. Cupp who said that McCain is “not a sellout,” later adding, “Senator McCain is everything that President Trump is not.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ja ... f193252972






Image
Image
‘Fox & Friends’ Host Brian Kilmeade Says Gina Haspel Should Be ‘Proud’ Of Torture Record

The nominee for CIA director will appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee for her confirmation hearing on Wednesday.


Along with President Donald Trump, the hosts at “Fox & Friends” issued their support Monday for Gina Haspel, the acting CIA director whom the president has nominated to officially take over the post.

Haspel’s controversial tenure at the CIA and involvement in the agency’s program that used torture techniques has prompted Democrats and Republicans to raise concerns about her nomination. In the fight against al Qaeda soon after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Haspel served as the head of a secret CIA site in Thailand where harsh interrogation tactics, including waterboarding, were used on “high-value detainees,” according to multiple reports.

Her Senate confirmation hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, but Haspel reportedly offered to withdraw her name from consideration over the weekend before senior White House officials persuaded her to remain as Trump’s nominee.

Trump tweeted his support for Haspel and defended her record on Monday, and the president’s favorite morning show echoed his sentiment.

″Thirty-two-year career ... and I think she should double-down and say, ‘I’m proud of what I accomplished ― whether it was black sites’ enhanced interrogation ― and I dare anyone to sit in my shoes and accomplish as much as I’ve done,’” co-host Brian Kilmeade said.

Kilmeade’s colleagues piled on.

“Just keep in mind, whatever she did when she was in power at that point, she was doing it as a directive and it was all within the law,” co-host Steve Doocy added.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fo ... fd2d29993a





Image
Image
The Pentagon Considers This Russian Sniper Rifle a Big Threat to US Soldiers. The NRA Helped Promote It.

So much for patriotism.


In late 2016, the US Army released a report noting that the Russian military, through experience gained during fighting in Ukraine, was undergoing a transformation and becoming a more potent battlefield threat to American forces. One troublesome development identified by the report’s authors was the increased proficiency of Russian snipers. “The capabilities of a sniper in a Russian contingent is far more advanced than the precision shooters U.S. formations have encountered over the last 15 years,” the study noted. One reason for this was the Russian military’s recent adoption of the ORSIS T-5000, a relatively new Russian-made firearm that the report called “one of the most capable bolt action sniper rifles in the world.” As one military technology expert noted, after reviewing this report, the US Army faced “being outgunned” by foes armed with the T-5000—which can be accurate at a distance of 2,000 yards—and these Russian rifles were showing up in Iraq and Ukraine. That is, this weapon posed a threat to US troops and those of its allies. Yet the National Rifle Association—which boasts it is identified with American patriotism—has helped promote Moscow-based ORSIS and its sniper rifle.

In December 2015, as has been previously reported, the NRA sent a high-level delegation to Russia. The group included Peter Brownell, then the first vice president of the NRA; David Keene, a past president; Joe Gregory, a top NRA donor; and David Clarke, then the sheriff of Milwaukee County, who would become a top surrogate for Donald Trump. (Brownell became president of the NRA last year.) The trip was at least partially subsidized by a curious Russian gun rights organization called the Right to Bear Arms that has been associated with two Russians, Maria Butina and Alexander Torshin, who for years had been forging connections with conservative organizations and gun aficionados in the United States. (Torshin—a director of the Russian central bank, a former senator, and a close ally of Putin—has been accused of having ties to Russian organized crime, an allegation he has denied. During the 2016 campaign, Torshin and Butina tried to connect with Trump campaign officials.) The Right to Bear Arms paid $6,000 toward the cost of Clarke’s trip.

While in Russia, members of the NRA delegation met with Dmitry Rogozin, the deputy prime minister, who was sanctioned by the Obama administration the previous year in retaliation for Putin’s invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Rogozin was a hardliner who led the ultra-right party Rodina, and part of his government portfolio was of particular interest to the NRA representatives: the arms industry. When Rogozin became deputy prime minister in 2011, he was given the task of overseeing Russia’s military-industrial complex and reviving the nation’s weapons-making business through private-public partnerships. One early endeavor in this regard, according to a Russian publication called Defense and Security, involved ORSIS, a small, private company, which about this time began receiving government contracts. (For a spell, Rogozin’s son was a deputy director of the firm.............)


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... romote-it/





Image
Image
John Oliver Explains What the Hell Has Happened to Rudy Giuliani

The comedian takes on the newest addition to “Stupid Watergate.”


Last week, Rudy Giuliani shocked the country—and even Sean Hannity—with the revelation that President Donald Trump’s money paid for the $130,000 hush agreement involving adult film star Stormy Daniels. The subsequent clean up efforts by Trump’s newest lawyer appear to only have added to the confusion, and perhaps even the president’s mounting legal troubles.

If the week left you wondering what has happened to the man once fondly referred to as “America’s Mayor,” John Oliver is here to explain that Giuliani, in short, has pretty much always been this bonkers. “People seem to be as shocked at finding out who Giuliani really is as a child at Disney World who accidentally saw Mickey Mouse pull off his head to reveal that he was actually Tilda Swinton,” Oliver said on Last Week Tonight. “‘Not only are you not what I thought you were a moment ago, you are fucking terrifying!'”

Below, Oliver takes on Giuliani’s record to show how the former New York City mayor’s past could explain the latest addition to “Stupid Watergate.”

https://youtu.be/mXQuto1fMp4

<

https://www.motherjones.com/media/2018/ ... -giuliani/






Image
Image
New York Attorney General Schneiderman resigns in wake of bombshell report

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, a frequent antagonist of President Donald Trump, resigned his post following an explosive report that detailed allegations against him of physical abuse by four women.

Schneiderman, who had been a rising star in the Democratic Party, said he will resign effective Tuesday at the close of business. He challenged the accusations of abuse by women with whom he had romantic relationships.

The New Yorker report began a startling and immediate fall for Schneiderman with politicians including New York‘s Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo — a presidential aspirant who is facing a rising primary threat from Cynthia Nixon — calling for the attorney general’s resignation.

“It’s been my great honor and privilege to serve as Attorney General for the people of the State of New York. In the last several hours, serious allegations, which I strongly contest, have been made against me,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “While these allegations are unrelated to my professional conduct or the operations of the office, they will effectively prevent me from leading the office’s work at this critical time. I therefore resign my office, effective at the close of business on May 8, 2018.”

Cuomo, who has never enjoyed a close relationship with Schneiderman, was among the first and most prominent of his fellow Democrats to call for the attorney general's ouster, as the governor faces his own reelection campaign and a rumored run for president in 2020. Both men have sought to build higher profiles in the Democratic Party nationally.

"No one is above the law, including New York's top legal officer,” Cuomo said in a statement after the New Yorker story published. “I will be asking an appropriate New York District Attorney to commence an immediate investigation, and proceed as the facts merit."

The New Yorker story and its aftermath marked a startling turn of events for the man who has gained fame by leading lawsuits challenging White House policies. Schneiderman’s resignation will almost certainly undermine the flood of lawsuits Schneiderman has advanced against Trump administration policies. The attorney general and the president have been mutual antagonists for years, dating back to Schneiderman’s lawsuits against Trump University.

Trump had not tweeted about the allegations Monday night but his son, Donald Trump Jr., fired off a series of tweets highlighting the attorney general's past comments about the president and the #MeToo movement, in light of the current allegations.

Cuomo was one of a host of political leaders, on the left and the right, to declare Schneiderman's career over within hours of the New Yorker story posting online. The pair had an antagonistic relationship for the majority of Cuomo’s first term in office, but had recently seemed to get along better.

Nixon, who had endorsed Schneiderman in 2010, the year he was first elected attorney general, praised his resignation, calling the descriptions of abuse “sickening.”

"It is the right decision for him to resign immediately,” he said in a statement late Monday. “The investigation should continue. We need to get to the bottom of the enormous culture of silence that protects those in power. We must continue to work to end this national epidemic."

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) called the "violent actions" described in the New Yorker article "abhorrent." She called for a "full and immediate investigation" into the allegations.

Former Schneiderman aides were shocked by the allegations against a man who has recently been at the forefront of legal advocacy on behalf of survivors of sexual assault and violence.

Neal Kwatra, Schneiderman’s former chief of staff who runs a consulting firm that does work for the state’s Democratic Party, happened to be appearing live on NY1 Monday evening with three other consultants to react to the political news of the day as the story broke. Asked if he’d ever heard any inklings of the behavior described in the article, Kwatra replied, “No, not at all.”

“This is obviously, shocking disturbing and in all likelihood disqualifying for Eric if the allegations are true. They read very credibly, just having quickly perused the article before we came on. It’s shocking,” Kwatra said.

Other former Schneiderman aides were similarly shocked by the suggestions of intimate partner violence. Political strategist Jennifer Cunningham, who has a daughter with Schneiderman from a marriage that ended in divorce, but who has remained close to the attorney general nonetheless, told the New York Times the allegations were completely out of step with a man she has known for decades.

“I’ve known Eric for nearly 35 years as a husband, father and friend,” said Cunningham. “These allegations are completely inconsistent with the man I know, who has always been someone of the highest character, outstanding values and a loving father.”

Democratic political consultant Alexis Grenell, reacting to the news just minutes after it broke live on NY1, said she’d heard “specific” information before about Schneiderman’s behavior.

“It’s a pretty detailed description of intimate partner violence that I think any credible service provider would recognize in an instant,” Grenell said.

“It’s not a matter of sex games gone wrong or role play as the attorney general tries to spin it. It’s violence against women. You asked Neal if he’d ever heard of any of this over the years and he said he hadn’t. I had,” Grenell said. “These women’s stories ring true, and I’m sure I’m not the only person who’s having a moment of recognition.”

Schneiderman had been outspoken about Harvey Weinstein, the film mogul who became the face of the #MeToo movement after a series of women accused him of sexually assaulting them. He filed a lawsuit against the Weinstein company seeking more compensation for Weinstein's alleged victims, and he's also been tasked with investigating Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Jr.'s office's handling of criminal complaints made against Weinstein.

“The mad hypocrisy of it is startling. And, I mean he’s got a big problem on his hands. I don’t see how the Democratic Party allows him to stay in that seat, just because of the stakes of the issue, politically and morally,” Republican political consultant Bill O’Reilly said.

Cuomo’s call for Schneiderman’s resignation was a contrast to his handling of allegations of sexual harassment leveled against state Sen. Jeff Klein, who has been accused by a former employee of forcibly kissing her outside of an Albany bar. In that case, Cuomo did not call for Klein to step down.

Names immediately began to surface for potential replacements — New York City Public Advocate Letitia James, state Sen. Mike Gianaris, former senior Cuomo aide and one-time superintendent of the Department of Financial services Ben Lawsky and former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.

Republican candidates are likely to surface as well, O’Reilly told POLITICO.

“There were no Republicans of note running but I think that’s something that will certainly change,” O’Reilly said, noting that Schneiderman’s 2014 Republican challenger John Cahill, a former aide to Gov. George Pataki, could enter the race.

“I think very possibly John Cahill, I had heard some rumors that there was a name coming forward but honest to god I haven’t heard it yet,” O’Reilly said.

“I think you could get a top tier candidate, and I think on the Democratic side as well,” O’Reilly said.


https://www.politico.com/states/new-yor ... ort-403563





Image
Image
Trump anti-family border policy tramples Melania message on kids

Rachel Maddow juxtaposes First Lady Melania Trump's announcement supporting the wellbeing of children with announcement by Jeff Sessions a few minutes later that it is officially the policy of the United State to remove children from their parents as part of border enforcement.

LINK TO VIDEO:

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watc ... associated





Image
Image
1. WINNER TO WINNER

Sarah Huckabee Sanders: Trump ‘Congratulates’ Putin on Swearing-In


White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Monday said that President Donald Trump “congratulates” Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was sworn in to a new six-year term over the weekend after protests erupted across the country. When asked if the White House had any message about the demonstrations, which led to the arrests of more than 1,600 people, Sanders replied that “the president congratulates [Putin] and looks forward to the time when we can hopefully have a good relationship with Russia.” “The United States believes everyone has the right to be heard and assemble peacefully,” she added. Trump congratulated Putin personally in a phone call shortly after he officially won the election, going against the advice of White House aides who reportedly told him not to congratulate the Russian leader.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/sanders-t ... wearing-in

Re: Politics

Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 10:29 am
by Hillbilly
Stephen Singer @SteveSinger10
Jerusalem to name square after Donald Trump
https://www.politico.eu/article/jerusal ... ald-trump/

Don Surber @donsurber
The worst hitler ever.

Re: Politics

Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 10:44 am
by Hillbilly
And for my Bernie supporting socialist friends out there ... The fake currency used in the game, World of Warcraft, is now worth 7 times more than the bolivar, Venezuelan currency.

Here is an article from last year when it was worth twice as much. Now worth 7 times more.

http://fortune.com/2017/08/01/venezuela ... -currency/

Re: Politics

Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 11:07 pm
by joez
Image
Image
Obama reacts to Trump's withdrawal from Iran deal

Barack Obama released a statement today calling President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal — one of Obama's landmark achievements as president — a "serious mistake."

Key quote:

"Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers."

The backdrop:

Obama has said he will only weigh in on Trump's decisions when American's core values and interests are at stake.

Full text:

There are few issues more important to the security of the United States than the potential spread of nuclear weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war in the Middle East. That’s why the United States negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in the first place.

The reality is clear. The JCPOA is working – that is a view shared by our European allies, independent experts, and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense. The JCPOA is in America’s interest – it has significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and verification regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North Korea. Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.

That is why today’s announcement is so misguided. Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.

Debates in our country should be informed by facts, especially debates that have proven to be divisive. So it’s important to review several facts about the JCPOA.

First, the JCPOA was not just an agreement between my Administration and the Iranian government. After years of building an international coalition that could impose crippling sanctions on Iran, we reached the JCPOA together with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, Russia, China, and Iran. It is a multilateral arms control deal, unanimously endorsed by a United Nations Security Council Resolution.

Second, the JCPOA has worked in rolling back Iran’s nuclear program. For decades, Iran had steadily advanced its nuclear program, approaching the point where they could rapidly produce enough fissile material to build a bomb. The JCPOA put a lid on that breakout capacity. Since the JCPOA was implemented, Iran has destroyed the core of a reactor that could have produced weapons-grade plutonium; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over 13,000) and placed them under international monitoring; and eliminated 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium – the raw materials necessary for a bomb. So by any measure, the JCPOA has imposed strict limitations on Iran's nuclear program and achieved real results.

Third, the JCPOA does not rely on trust – it is rooted in the most far-reaching inspections and verification regime ever negotiated in an arms control deal. Iran’s nuclear facilities are strictly monitored. International monitors also have access to Iran’s entire nuclear supply chain, so that we can catch them if they cheat. Without the JCPOA, this monitoring and inspections regime would go away.

Fourth, Iran is complying with the JCPOA. That was not simply the view of my Administration. The United States intelligence community has continued to find that Iran is meeting its responsibilities under the deal, and has reported as much to Congress. So have our closest allies, and the international agency responsible for verifying Iranian compliance – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Fifth, the JCPOA does not expire. The prohibition on Iran ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is permanent. Some of the most important and intrusive inspections codified by the JCPOA are permanent. Even as some of the provisions in the JCPOA do become less strict with time, this won’t happen until ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years into the deal, so there is little reason to put those restrictions at risk today.

Finally, the JCPOA was never intended to solve all of our problems with Iran. We were clear-eyed that Iran engages in destabilizing behavior – including support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel and its neighbors. But that’s precisely why it was so important that we prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Every aspect of Iranian behavior that is troubling is far more dangerous if their nuclear program is unconstrained. Our ability to confront Iran’s destabilizing behavior – and to sustain a unity of purpose with our allies – is strengthened with the JCPOA, and weakened without it.

Because of these facts, I believe that the decision to put the JCPOA at risk without any Iranian violation of the deal is a serious mistake. Without the JCPOA, the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East. We all know the dangers of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. It could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose unacceptable dangers to America’s own security; and trigger an arms race in the world’s most dangerous region. If the constraints on Iran’s nuclear program under the JCPOA are lost, we could be hastening the day when we are faced with the choice between living with that threat, or going to war to prevent it.

In a dangerous world, America must be able to rely in part on strong, principled diplomacy to secure our country. We have been safer in the years since we achieved the JCPOA, thanks in part to the work of our diplomats, many members of Congress, and our allies. Going forward, I hope that Americans continue to speak out in support of the kind of strong, principled, fact-based, and unifying leadership that can best secure our country and uphold our responsibilities around the globe.


https://www.axios.com/obama-statement-o ... ef93b.html





Image
Image
Ex-CIA chief John Brennan goes off on Trump's Iran moves: This is 'madness'

Former CIA Director John Brennan on Tuesday slammed President Trump for his decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Iran nuclear agreement, calling the move a "threat to national security."

Brennan, an Obama Cabinet official who has vocally criticized Trump, argued in a tweet that his Iran decision would weaken Trump's hand in pushing to curb North Korea's nuclear program this year.

"Today, Donald Trump simultaneously lied about the Iranian nuclear deal, undermined global confidence in US commitments, alienated our closest allies, strengthened Iranian hawks, & gave North Korea more reason to keep its nukes," Brennan tweeted.

"This madness is a danger to our national security," he added.

John O. Brennan
@JohnBrennan
Today, Donald Trump simultaneously lied about the Iranian nuclear deal, undermined global confidence in US commitments, alienated our closest allies, strengthened Iranian hawks, & gave North Korea more reason to keep its nukes. This madness is a danger to our national security.

4:44 PM - May 8, 2018


Trump announced Tuesday at the White House that the U.S. would pull out of the multi-nation agreement that sought to curb Iran's nuclear program, calling the deal "horrible" and "one-sided."

“Today’s action sends a critical message: the United States no longer makes empty threats,” Trump said. “It didn’t bring calm, it didn’t bring peace, and it never will."

The leaders of France, Germany and the United Kingdom released a statement denouncing Trump's move while pledging their commitment to upholding the 2015 agreement negotiated by the Obama administration.

“Our governments remain committed to ensuring the agreement is upheld, and will work with all the remaining parties to the deal to ensure this remains the case including through ensuring the continuing economic benefits to the Iranian people that are linked to the agreement,” they said.

http://thehill.com/policy/international ... is-madness






Image
Image
Trump’s Iran Deal Exit Is A Win For Russia

It’s a striking example of the president again making a move condemned by U.S. allies but likely to help Vladimir Putin.


WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal will weaken U.S. relationships around the world and create problems that U.S. foreign policy will be grappling with for years, but it’s also a boon for the U.S. rival that American intelligence said helped Trump get elected: Russia.

Trump’s move will likely lead toward progress on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s two chief goals: splintering the U.S.-led alliance of democratic powers that currently dominates global affairs and fortifying Russia’s alternative network, which includes Iran and its partners across the Middle East.

A split between the U.S. and its three most powerful allies — France, Germany and the U.K. — was clear immediately after Trump’s announcement. The leaders of the latter three countries issued a joint statement expressing “regret and concern” and saying they want to sustain the Iran agreement, which promised Iran some freedom from international sanctions in exchange for limits on and guarantees of transparency about its nuclear development. They reiterated what Trump’s own military advisers and new secretary of state have said: Iran is abiding by the deal.

“America moves further away from our key allies, which has implications that are extremely important and detrimental,” said Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), a prominent member of the House Armed Services Committee.

The U.S. committed to the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, Germany, France, Russia, China and the U.K. All the other countries plan to stay in the accord.

The U.S. and Europe have always had disputes. But the worry is that something fundamental is shifting.

Trump’s reneging on past U.S. commitments on Iran and climate change, along with his willingness to wage a trade war with Europe and continuously misrepresent NATO, has made it hard for America’s foreign partners to think he truly sees them as friends.

That the president made his Tuesday announcement despite warnings from his own party’s top national security voices and independent experts reminds other countries that they can’t assume that U.S. supporters of traditional diplomacy and international norms will be able to keep American relationships on track. The implicit promise of an experienced, largely bureaucratic foreign service is that it brings professionalism and longterm thinking to whatever policy an elected official wants to pursue ― and on Tuesday, U.S. diplomats didn’t even have a plan for next steps after Trump’s speech.

The Europeans would prefer that the U.S. continue to operate as it traditionally did, said Federiga Bindi, a former official in the Italian government and a senior fellow at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. “I think with [the Iran deal announcement] they start to see who Trump really is. The U.S. is never going to recover from that.............”


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tr ... 3224ee17d1





Image
Image
Trump's withdrawal from Iran deal sets up best relations with Israel in a decade

WASHINGTON
When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released what he said was new information about Iran's nuclear-weapons development, his dramatic unveiling was beamed across the globe. But it was really designed for an audience of one: President Trump.

The president and Netanyahu have had a close friendship since the beginning of the Trump administration, with the U.S. siding with Israel on a host of policy issues that had long been on the back burner. But Trump’s announcement Tuesday that the U.S. was withdrawing from the landmark Iran nuclear deal cemented that relationship like nothing else in the past 16 months.

"Relations between the countries are pretty good and particularly between the two executives, it's very strong," said Lester Munson, former staff director to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who worked in the George W. Bush administration. "Trump needs vocal allies in the world and Netanyahu is willing to do that."

Trump’s decision to make good on a contentious campaign promise, siding with Israel over America's most trusted European allies, repaired some of the fraying of the U.S.-Israeli bond that occurred during the eight-year term ofhis predecessor. Barack Obama and Netanyahu didn't get along personally and the Obama administration was more willing to criticize Israel publicly — and to allow the United Nations to do the same — than any previous president since Israel's creation in 1948.............


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... Row1_card1





Image
Image
World Leaders Condemn Trump For Withdrawing From Iran Nuclear Deal

France, the U.K. and Germany had attempted a last-ditch push to get Trump to change his mind in recent weeks.


Image

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday vowed to stay in the Iran nuclear deal shortly after President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. will withdraw from the multinational pact, a decision that ignited outcry and concern from fellow world leaders.

Rouhani, in a blistering televised address, criticized the U.S. as a country that “never adheres to its commitments” and accused its people of having “always adopted a hostile approach.”

“By exiting the deal, America has officially undermined its commitment to an international treaty,” he said.


Rouhani said his country will continue to work with other nations that are part of the agreement, though it will resume its nuclear activities if the deal’s goals are not met.

“If we achieve the deal’s goals in cooperation with other members of the deal, it will remain in place,” he said.

Iranian state television also called Trump’s decision to withdraw “illegal, illegitimate and undermines international agreements,” Reuters reported.

Turkish Economy Minister Nihat Zeybekci said his country will continue its trade with Iran and not answer to anyone else on the matter.


“From now on, we will carry out our trade with Iran, within the possible framework, until the end, and we will not give account to anyone for this,” Zeybekci said in an interview with broadcaster CNN Turk.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long opposed the deal, appeared to be one of the few international leaders to immediately applaud Trump’s decision. In a short televised address on Tuesday, he said the deal with Iran was “a disaster for our region, a disaster for the peace of the world.”


Image

Key players in the race to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons have meanwhile reacted with alarm and concern to Trump’s announcement.

British Prime Minister Theresa May, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron released a joint statement that expressed disappointment in Trump’s decision to withdraw from the agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA.

“Together, we emphasise our continuing commitment to the JCPoA. This agreement remains important for our shared security,” the statement read.


“According to the [International Atomic Energy Agency],” an agency that has monitored and verified Iran’s nuclear-related commitments, “Iran continues to abide by the restrictions set out by the JCPoA, in line with its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The world is a safer place as a result,” the statement continued.

Macron, tweeting shortly after Trump’s announced decision, re-emphasized that shared upset.

“The nuclear non-proliferation regime is at stake,” he said, adding that France will work on a broader agreement to cover Iran’s nuclear activity, ballistics program and regional activities.


Former President Barack Obama and Former Secretary of State John Kerry also chimed in, with Obama defending the JCPOA as a pact that was “working.”

Image

“The JCPOA is in America’s interest ― it has significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish ― its inspections and verification regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North Korea,” the former president’s statement said. “Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes ― with Iran ― the very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.”

Barack Obama
@BarackObama
There are few issues more important to the security of the US than the potential spread of nuclear weapons or the potential for even more destructive war in the Middle East. Today’s decision to put the JCPOA at risk is a serious mistake. My full statement: https://www.facebook.com/barackobama/po ... 4913976749

2:40 PM - May 8, 2018


Kerry also lamented Trump’s decision in his own statement, saying it “weakens our security, breaks America’s word, isolates us from our European allies, puts Israel at greater risk, empowers Iran’s hardliners, and reduces our global leverage to address Tehran’s misbehavior, while damaging the ability of future Administrations to make international agreements.”

Image


Macron and his fellow European co-signatories had taken turns trying to convince Trump to remain committed to the deal. In addition to reports of diplomatic wrangling between Europe and the U.S. over the past few weeks, U.K. foreign secretary Boris Johnson traveled to the U.S. Monday, hammering home his position in a media blitz.

Johnson insisted in an op-ed for The New York Times that leaders could work on the deal’s flaws. On the president’s morning cable news show of choice, “Fox & Friends,” Johnson urged Trump not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater.” He then told Sky News that Trump would be worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize if he could fix the deal.

Johnson expressed his upset over Trump’s decision on Tuesday but affirmed that the “U.K. remains strongly committed to the JCPOA.”


Both Merkel and Macron also traveled to Washington in recent weeks to have similar conversations with Trump.

Macron said France doesn’t plan to leave the agreement but is happy to work with Trump in crafting a new, more comprehensive deal that addresses some of the issues that both countries feel were left out of the current version. French officials made it even more clear that they’re committed to the existing deal in the lead-up to Trump’s announcement.


“We are determined to save this deal because this accord safeguards against nuclear proliferation and is the right way to stop Iran getting a nuclear weapon,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said Monday.

Netanyahu pulled out the big guns last week in his push to get Trump to scrap it altogether.

“Iran lied, big time,” he said in a speech delivered in English.


Image

Iran has made clear that it has no intention of renegotiating or forging a new deal.

“If America leaves the nuclear deal, this will entail historic regret for it,” Rouhani warned in a televised speech earlier this month. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif suggested in April that if the U.S. pulled out of the nuclear accord, his country could also exit the deal and resume its nuclear program at a “much greater speed.” Iran has no reason to continue to abide by the agreement if the economic benefits “start to diminish,” he said.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/wo ... 5c3d6936fb





Image
Image
Michael Cohen Took Cash From Russian Oligarch After Election

The Daily Beast can confirm Michael Avenatti’s claim made Tuesday about Trump’s lawyer.


The Daily Beast can confirm that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen received hundreds of thousands of dollars from a company controlled by Putin-aligned Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg.

The allegations were initially made Tuesday by Michael Avenatti, porn actress Stormy Daniels’ lawyer, and confirmed by a source familiar with the matter.

“How the fuck did Avenatti find out?” the source asked The Daily Beast.

According to a dossier published by Avenatti on Tuesday evening, “Vekselberg and his cousin Mr. Andrew Intrater routed eight payments to Mr. Cohen through a company named Columbus Nova LLC beginning in January 2017 and continuing until at least August 2017.”

The funds, Avenatti suggested, may have been used to reimburse Cohen for the $130,000 hush payment made to Daniels in exchange for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump.

Intrater was also a donor to the Republican National Committee, where Cohen served as a deputy finance chairman. In June 2017, Intrater donated $35,000 to a joint fundraising committee for the RNC and Trump’s reelection campaign. He also gave a quarter-million dollars to Trump’s inaugural committee. (Previously, Intrater gave only to Democrats like Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. Ted Kennedy.)

Intrater and Vekselberg have also been active investors in the U.S. technology and media sectors. Columbus Nova Technology Partners was the first and only outside investor in Gawker Media, before the company was felled by a lawsuit funded by Trump ally Peter Thiel. Columbus Nova also backed the record label of former Def Jam boss Lyor Cohen, invested in the streaming music pioneer Rhapsody, and put money behind a gig-economy site, a “genetic risk” firm, and a company called Tomfoolery Incorporated. .............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/michael-c ... n?ref=home





Image
Image
Mitch McConnell Bends The Rules Again To Confirm Trump’s Judges

He is going around Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin to put Michael Brennan into a lifetime court seat in her state.


WASHINGTON ― When the Senate votes this week to confirm Michael Brennan to be a lifetime judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, it will be voting on a nominee who never should have made it to the Senate floor.

That’s because Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) was denied the ability to stop him. When President Donald Trump nominated Brennan to the court based in Baldwin’s state, she should have had the right, per longstanding Senate tradition, to deny or advance his nomination in the Judiciary Committee.

But when she announced she would not be turning in a so-called blue slip for Brennan ― it’s literally a blue piece of paper that signals a senator’s support for a home-state nominee ― the chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ignored her and gave Brennan a hearing anyway, and then voted his nomination out of committee.

On Tuesday, Baldwin urged senators to oppose Brennan and decried Republican leaders bending the rules to push him through.


“Today, respect for the time-honored blue slip comes to an end,” she said on the Senate floor. “I urge my colleagues to recognize that while today’s action disrespects my role as the junior senator from Wisconsin, tomorrow it may well be you.”

Grassley had the blessing of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) when he bypassed Baldwin. The GOP leader has been watering down the role of blue slips since Trump became president. He’s argued that no single senator should have the power to halt a Circuit Court nomination.

“My view is that no one senator ought to be able to stop a circuit judge,” McConnell said Thursday to conservative radio show host Hugh Hewitt.

It’s one of the most glaring double standards playing out in the Senate today.

Never mind that McConnell’s greatest legacy is single-handedly denying President Barack Obama a hearing on his Supreme Court pick. GOP senators routinely abused blue slips to block Obama’s court picks, to a level of absurdity. Now that a Republican is in the White House, McConnell wants to prevent Democrats from using the same tool.

The reason blue slips exist at all is to inject bipartisanship into the judicial confirmation process. Democrats upheld the rule throughout Obama’s presidency. But the tradition is unraveling as McConnell focuses on his broader goal while Trump is president: to confirm as many young and conservative judges as possible.

“This is my top priority in the Senate,” McConnell told Hewitt. “By appointing and confirming these strict constructionists to the courts who are in their late 40s or early 50s … I believe we’re making a generational change in the country.”

He’s right. Trump has been nominating judges at record-breaking levels, and the majority of them have records of being anti-LGBTQ rights, anti-abortion rights or anti-voting rights. Nearly all are young, white and male. Since these are lifetime gigs, their court rulings will affect millions of Americans for decades after Trump has left the White House.


Baldwin’s anger over Brennan’s vote isn’t limited to the way he got to the Senate floor. His nomination is the result of a mangled partisan process that has plagued this empty Circuit Court seat for years. Wisconsin’s other senator, Republican Ron Johnson, single-handedly blocked Obama from filling this vacancy for more than six years. Johnson did that by, wait for it... not turning in a blue slip.

Beyond that, when the Trump administration first nominated Brennan, a 57-year-old Milwaukee lawyer, Baldwin said it did so without “meaningful consultation” with her or Johnson. It also broke with precedent by not getting the required support from the Wisconsin Judicial Nominating Commission.

“Trump chose to move forward in a partisan manner,” Baldwin said Tuesday. “Today, we send the message that neither this nor a future president needs to respect the role of home-state senators in the selection of judicial nominees.”

Brennan’s confirmation vote will be the second time this year that McConnell is bucking blue slips to confirm a judge.

In January, he held a confirmation vote for now-U.S. Circuit Court Judge David Stras of Minnesota. Then-Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) did not turn in a blue slip for Stras, but Grassley gave him a hearing anyway and sent his nomination to the Senate floor.

Carl Tobias, a judicial nominations expert and law professor at Virginia’s University of Richmond, said it was an “unpersuasive” argument by McConnell that blue slips should be honored for district nominees but not for Circuit Court nominees.

“Double standards don’t bother him,” said Tobias. “Mitch McConnell just keeps ratcheting up and undermining Senate norms.”


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ta ... fd2d2baf9c





Image
Image
Michael Cohen Just Mortgaged His Prized Trump Condo in a $9 Million Loan Deal

The fixer needs his own fix.


Michael Cohen, the longtime Trump fixer at the center of multiple presidential scandals, just mortgaged his multi-million-dollar condo in the swanky Trump Park Avenue building on the Upper East Side of Manhattan as part of a $9 million loan deal related to his troubled taxicab business.

Cohen’s new loan comes as he faces assorted problems. Three weeks ago, his home and office were raided by federal agents seeking information about several matters. Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s latest lead lawyer, has made a series of public remarks about the Stormy Daniels scandal that have hardly helped Cohen, who negotiated the $130,000 hush-money deal with the porn star. A lengthy New York Times investigation published over the weekend detailed Cohen’s history of curious business endeavors. And Vanity Fair reports that Cohen feels increasingly isolated and is losing weight.

Cohen has long had a business dealing in taxi medallions—the metal plates that give cabs the right to operate in New York City. Owning medallions was once a lucrative business—the price for a medallion reportedly peaked at $1 million each in 2013. But since the rise of Uber and Lyft, the value has crashed; last fall, medallions were fetching less than $200,000 a piece at auction, according to the New York Post.

In 2014, Cohen owned dozens of medallions worth an estimated $30 million, and he used them as collateral to borrow $20 million from two banks, including Sterling National Bank. Cohen has a partner in his taxicab business, Evgeny Friedman, who operates at least some of the cabs Cohen owns. As the Times reported, Cohen refinanced his medallion loans last month in a new transaction with Sterling, using as collateral money that Friedman might owe him. The Times described this arrangement as “unusual.”

But according to mortgage documents filed publicly on Monday, Cohen and his wife, Laura Cohen, also mortgaged their Trump Park Avenue condo as part of the deal with Sterling. Cohen’s attorney declined to comment about this new mortgage............


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... ump-condo/





Image
Image
A Lot of People Sure Gave Michael Cohen a Lot of Money

Today, the New York Times gives us a taste of the kind of thing that special prosecutor Robert Mueller must have in his possession after seizing Michael Cohen’s business records:

Financial records reviewed by The New York Times show that Mr. Cohen, President Trump’s personal lawyer and longtime fixer, used the shell company, Essential Consultants L.L.C., for an array of business activities that went far beyond what was publicly known. Transactions adding up to at least $4.4 million flowed through Essential Consultants starting shortly before Mr. Trump was elected president and continuing to this January, the records show.

Among the previously unreported transactions were payments last year of about $500,000 from Columbus Nova, an investment firm in New York whose biggest client is a company controlled by Viktor Vekselberg, the Russian oligarch.

Columbus Nova says the money was a “consulting fee.” And they weren’t the only ones:

AT&T made four payments totaling $200,000 between October 2017 and January 2018, according to the documents. AT&T, whose proposed merger with Time Warner is pending before the Justice Department, issued a statement on Tuesday evening confirming that it made payments to Mr. Cohen’s firm. “Essential Consulting was one of several firms we engaged in early 2017 to provide insights into understanding the new administration,” the statement said. “They did no legal or lobbying work for us, and the contract ended in December 2017.”

$200,000 for “insights” into the Trump administration! Not bad. I wonder what Cohen told them?


https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/ ... -of-money/





Image
Image
Melania Trump aide scolds media for pointing out recycled Obama-era document

The office of first lady Melania Trump on Tuesday scolded "opposition media" for pointing out that Trump reused an educational booklet from the Obama-era Federal Trade Commission in unveiling her new "Be Best" campaign on childhood wellness.

After Trump launched the childhood "well-being, social media use and opioid abuse" initiative on Monday, numerous outlets, including POLITICO, reported that one of the documents distributed by the White House were a nearly identical match to a report released by the FTC under former President Barack Obama.

BuzzFeed offered up the headline "Melania Trump Reused An Obama-Era Pamphlet For Her New Anti-Cyberbullying Campaign" while other outlets delivered more cutting headlines, such as "Melania Trump Ripped Off an Old FTC Document for 'Be Best.'"

There were also numerous parallels drawn between the recycled document and the incident at the Republican National Convention, where it appeared that Melania Trump reused many of the same lines from Michelle Obama's Democratic National Convention speech in 2008.


Stephanie Grisham, the communications director for the first lady, on Tuesday ripped into the "opposition media" for their "focus" on the booklet over the substance of Trump's campaign.

"Mrs. Trump agreed to add Be Best branding and distribute the booklet in an effort to use her platform to amplify the positive message within," Grisham said in a statement. "As she said in yesterday’s speech, she is going to use Be Best to promote people and organizations to encourage conversation and replication, and helping the FTC distribute this booklet is just one small example............."


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... ent-573720





Image
Image
Mueller is Ready for Trump. The President and His Lawyers Can't Say the Same.

During a four-hour practice with his legal team, Trump reportedly made it through two questions.


One particular source of angst for the attorneys of Donald J. Trump, American president, is the prospect of The Interview. Special Counsel Robert Mueller has requested a sit-down chat with the president to hear his side of things on whether he or his associates colluded with Russian officials during the 2016 election, and whether he obstructed justice when he fired FBI Director James Comey. Trump's legal team is ever-changing, but no matter who's on staff at the moment, they can't seem to settle on whether he should be put in the same room with the granite-nosed investigator.

That ever-changing quality reared its head last week, when lead lawyer John Dowd and primary mustache Ty Cobb both departed the team. They were replaced by Emmet Flood—a powerful Washington defense attorney who has served as outside counsel to past presidents, including President Clinton during his impeachment proceedings—and Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor who seems to have undergone some changes in recent years.


The latter has made a bit of a mess. He seemed to admit on national television that Trump knew about Michael Cohen's payment to Stormy Daniels—an indication Trump and his team had lied incessantly about it up until that very moment—and that the Russia probe was a factor in Trump's decision to fire Comey. That's not a great move when you're suspected of obstructing justice, but then again, the president already said the same—again, on national television—soon after the deed was done. How is obstruction of justice still a question?

Anyway, Giuliani is still at it, and could be found in Every Media Outlet once again Tuesday morning. First, he got on the horn with the folks at The Wall Street Journal to explain why “every day [the legal team] swings a little different” on whether Trump should sit for the interview. But there was a more intriguing passage in the report:

Another consideration is how Mr. Trump would perform as a witness and whether he has the discipline to avoid unnecessary tangents that open himself to new questions. “Anyone can see he has great difficulty staying on a subject,” one person familiar with the legal team’s deliberations said ...


... Preparing Mr. Trump to testify would be a serious distraction to his work as president, eating into time he needs to deal with pressing global issues, Mr. Trump’s lawyers contend.


In an informal, four-hour practice session, Mr. Trump’s lawyers were only able to walk him through two questions, given the frequent interruptions on national-security matters along with Mr. Trump’s loquaciousness, one person familiar with the matter said.


There seems to be an effort here from the Journal's sources to cast Trump's issues in the mock interview as borne of the many demands of his job. There's probably some merit to that, though the case might be more compelling under a president who didn't spend so much of his time live-tweeting Fox News.

In truth, the bread slices of this excuse sandwich are a little more convincing: that the president has trouble staying on topic and is liable to go off on a (possibly incriminating) rant. This was reinforced on one of Giuliani's other stops on his press tour this morning, at CBS News:
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is now on President Trump's legal team, told CBS News correspondent Paula Reid Monday that special counsel Robert Mueller's office has rejected proposals to allow Mr. Trump to answer questions from investigators in writing.
The president's legal team has signaled that this would be their preferred format for a possible interview, since it helps protect Mr. Trump from the possibility of lying or misleading investigators, which is a criminal offense.


Now that adds up. You need only look at Trump's response to a question about the Stormy Daniels payment last week to see how effortlessly and instinctually he lies. It is something beyond second nature, and it's not hard to imagine something false bursting from is lips as he sits across from Mueller before he even has a chance to consider whether it's a good idea. When you add in that the questions Mueller submitted to Trump's team—which were almost immediately leaked to the media—are ones to which the special prosecutor almost certainly already has the answers, the whole thing seems like an easy way for Trump to get caught lying to federal investigators under oath.

Giuliani has repeatedly characterized The Interview as a "trap" in this respect. While there are certainly concerns surrounding federal law enforcement's strategies in some cases—particularly terrorism investigations, where there are often legitimate questions about entrapment—this doesn't seem like one of them. The trap wouldn't work if Trump was innocent and told the truth.

But Trump's past record in depositions is not promising in that regard. The most famous and somewhat hilarious example comes from journalist Timothy O'Brien, who wrote a book on Trump that the Billionaire Alpha Man deemed insufficiently adoring. Specifically, Trump thought O'Brien undersold how rich he was. He sued O'Brien and was compelled to testify to back up his claims about his wealth. Things, as O'Brien detailed in Bloomberg, did not go well for Mr. Trump:


Hammered by White and her deputies, Trump ultimately had to admit 30 times that he had lied over the years about all sorts of stuff: how much of a big Manhattan real estate project he owned; the price of one of his golf club memberships; the size of the Trump Organization; his wealth; his speaking fees; how many condos he had sold; his debts, and whether he borrowed money from his family to avoid going personally bankrupt. He also lied during the deposition about his business dealings with career criminals.


As O'Brien detailed, this was rooted in tough questioning from his team of lawyers. But it was also in large part because of who Trump is and how he operates:

Trump is impatient and has never been an avid or dedicated reader. That’s OK if you’d rather play golf, but it’s not OK when you need to absorb abundant or complex details ... Trump didn’t appear to be well prepared when we deposed him, a weakness that my lawyers exploited ... Trump, for example, had submitted a document to the court from his accountant outlining his assets and liabilities. He was proud of the document’s glowing conclusions but hadn’t seemed to have read most of it prior to sitting down with my lawyers–including a section that said that the report wasn’t a reliable gauge of his wealth. Trump seemed surprised when my lawyers pointed that out.


O'Brien even highlighted that Trump's hubris sometimes prevents him from letting his minions take the fall. The idea they would be operating independently of him—and thus would shoulder the liability, but also wouldn't be directly following his orders—can cause him to short-circuit and insist he knew every damn thing they were doing. This is not an ideal trait when, in the Russia probe, there's a strong possibility that Trump's associates were up to shady business genuinely without his knowledge. He might insist he did know out of a debilitating sense of pride.

And then, of course, there's this famous bit of dialogue with one of O'Brien's lawyers, Andrew Ceresney, via CNN:

TRUMP: My net worth fluctuates, and it goes up and down with the markets and with attitudes and with feelings, even my own feelings, but I try.


CERESNEY: Let me just understand that a little. You said your net worth goes up and down based upon your own feelings?


TRUMP: Yes, even my own feelings, as to where the world is, where the world is going, and that can change rapidly from day to day ...


CERESNEY: When you publicly state a net worth number, what do you base that number on?


TRUMP: I would say it's my general attitude at the time that the question may be asked. And as I say, it varies.


It's hard to see how putting this person in a room with a seasoned federal investigator at the top of his game is going to go well for the president and his legal team. But it's not like much of his defense strategy has made a lot of sense up to this point.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a ... er-russia/

Re: Politics

Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 2:31 pm
by Peter C
Letter from Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland


I don’t know whether you saw the news, but Maryland insurance companies just released their requests for premium increases in the individual marketplace for the coming year – and the results are eye-popping all around. One provider submitted an astronomical 91.4 percent increase over last year’s rates!

So why did this happen?

It is an outrageous truth that this situation was predictable and premeditated. These skyrocketing costs are a direct result of actions taken by the Trump administration and Congressional Republicans to sabotage the Affordable Care Act. Even former Trump Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price admitted as much last week when he said that provisions tucked into the tax bill would result in rate increases for working families and “help” to undermine the Affordable Care Act.

Make no mistake – monthly premiums at these skyrocketing rates will force working families out of the health care market and leave more and more Americans uninsured. Fortunately, the Maryland state legislature recently passed legislation to try to mitigate this damage in our state; but states should not have to clean up the mess created by the Trump administration and its allies. This is something we cannot sit back and accept.

We need to keep up the fight and demand action by the Senate to stabilize our insurance markets and ensure people have access to quality, affordable health care. Add your name if you agree that we must demand better for American families.

The GOP did not want to advertise the fact that not only did their tax scam primarily benefit the very wealthy and big corporations, but it also was paid for by ensuring that Americans face skyrocketing health care premiums and $1.5 trillion in new debt (a debt the GOP has already tried to use as justification for cutting Medicaid and Medicare in their proposed budget).

We cannot let them hide from the ugly truth of their actions. This sabotage by the Trump administration and the GOP in Congress is having harmful, real-life consequences for working families in Maryland and throughout our country. The Maryland Insurance Commissioner recently said he believes this health insurance market is in a “death spiral.”

I am working hard to do everything I can to elect Democrats in November who will fight for quality, affordable health care and stop the Trump administration from doing more damage. Elections have consequences, and we need to work together to ensure that Republicans pay the price for their actions.

Thank you for being part of this fight.

Chris Van Hollen
U.S. Senator

Re: Politics

Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by Hillbilly
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Every time we've had major tax cuts in this country we have had a boom in tax revenue.

Every. Time.

U.S. Budget Just Made History: Best Month Ever

ByJames Barrett

May 8, 2018

In April, the federal government took in a record sum of $515 billion in taxes, according to a newly released Congressional Budget Office report. During that time, we spent $297 billion. Yes, you read that correctly: We actually took in more than we spent — a lot more. That $218 billion surplus is, in fact, a new record, beating the previous record set back in 2001 ($190 billion) by $28 billion.

As The Washington Times points out, the amount of the surplus surprised CBO analysts, who were predicting about $40 billion less, though some of that has to do with a shift in timing of payments. In its report, the CBO suggests that the unexpectedly high tax revenues was a result of "stronger-than-expected" economic growth last year and in early 2018.

"Those payments were mostly related to economic activity in 2017 and may reflect stronger-than-expected income growth in that year," reads the summary. "Part of the strength in receipts also may reflect larger-than-anticipated payments for economic activity in 2018. The reasons for the added revenues will be better understood as more detailed information becomes available later this year."

While the news for April is good, a surplus in April is common and some of the record-setting numbers have to do with "shifts in the timing of certain payments that otherwise would have been due on a weekend," the CBO notes. We are also still behind for fiscal year 2018.

"The federal budget deficit was $382 billion for the first seven months of fiscal year 2018, the Congressional Budget Office estimates, $37 billion more than the shortfall recorded during the same period last year," the CBO reports. "Revenues and outlays were higher, by 4 percent and 5 percent, respectively, than they were during the first seven months of fiscal year 2017."

Here's the section from the new report summarizing the revenues and outlays from April:

The federal government realized a surplus of $218 billion in April 2018, CBO estimates—$35 billion larger than the surplus in April 2017.

CBO estimates that receipts in April 2018 totaled $515 billion—$59 billion (or 13 percent) more than those in the same month last year. Individual income and payroll taxes rose by $73 billion (or 20 percent), on net. Nonwithheld payments for those taxes, largely final payments of 2017 taxes, rose by $60 billion. Withholding of individual income and payroll taxes rose by $7 billion (or 4 percent). Withheld taxes rose both because wages and salaries were higher and because April 2018 had one more business day than April 2017. However, those factors were partially offset because the share of wages withheld for taxes was lower, CBO estimates, reflecting the new withholding tables issued in January. Corporate income tax payments declined by $14 billion (or 24 percent).

Total spending in April 2018 was $297 billion, CBO estimates—$24 billion more than the sum in April 2017.

The largest changes in outlays were as follows:

Net interest on the public debt rose by $6 billion (or 21 percent).
Social Security benefits rose by $4 billion (or 5 percent).
Spending for military programs of the Department of Defense rose by $4 billion (or 11 percent).
Medicaid benefits rose by $3 billion (or 10 percent).

Spending for other programs and activities increased or decreased by smaller amounts.

Read the full CBO report here.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53821

Re: Politics

Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 7:13 pm
by Hillbilly
In response to Senator Van Hollen's letter ...

While I'm posting about the CBO why don't we talk about the findings of the negative effects of Obamacare on U.S. citizens during their report that came out BEFORE Donald Trump was elected.

** In that report the CBO said Obamacare would destroy 2.4 million jobs by 2024.

The reduction in CBO’s projections of hours worked represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2.0 million in 2017, rising to about 2.5 million in 2024. Although CBO projects that total employment (and compensation) will increase over the coming decade, that increase will be smaller than it would have been in the absence of the ACA.

** In that report it said that in 2024 there would still be 31 million people in America without health insurance.

Still, according to estimates by CBO and JCT, about 31 million nonelderly residents of the United States are likely to be without health insurance in 2024, roughly one out of every nine such residents.

** In that report there was a huge surprise ... Around 48 to 56 million people who liked their health insurance would lose their health insurance! (gasp! *shock*)

CBO and JCT project that, as a result of the ACA, between 6 million and 7 million fewer people will have employment-based insurance coverage each year from 2016 through 2024 than would be the case in the absence of the ACA.

** In their report the CBO wrote of their fears that Obamacare would reduce the incentive to find and keep a job.

[R]educed incentives to work attributable to the Affordable Care Act (ACA)—with most of the impact arising from new subsidies for health insurance purchased through exchanges—will have a larger negative effect on participation toward the end of that period.

[…]

By providing subsidies that decline with rising income (and increase with falling income) and by making some people financially better off, the ACA will create an incentive for some people to work less.

[…]

[M]ore than 2.5 million people are likely to reduce the amount of labor they choose to supply to some degree because of the ACA, even though many of them will not leave the labor force entirely.


** And in their report the CBO talked about tax increases due to Obamacare.

In addition, beginning in 2018, the ACA imposes an excise tax on certain high-cost health insurance plans. CBO expects that the burden of that tax will, over time, be borne primarily by workers in the form of smaller after-tax compensation. Some firms may seek to avoid or limit the amount of the excise tax they pay by switching to less expensive health plans, and in that case workers’ wages should rise by a corresponding amount. Those wages will be subject to income and payroll taxes, however, so total tax payments by those workers will be higher than they would have been in the absence of the ACA. After-tax compensation will thus fall whether firms pay the excise tax or take steps to avoid it, and the resulting increases in average and marginal tax rates will cause a slight decline in the supply of labor, CBO estimates.

As I said, this report came out BEFORE Trump was elected. So while I always find it cute when democrats try to blame the GOP for our health care mess the ACA is their baby. They made that bed. And now we might hear, oh, but the GOP won't raise taxes enough to cover this pile of shit plan... TOUGH.

Obamacare is a pile of shit. It was a pile of shit before Trump was elected, and it is still a steaming stinking pile of shit. And the quicker the GOP can get rid of it using whatever tactics at their disposal not having a filebuster proof 60 votes in the senate the better off we will all be. And whatever tactics they may be using I am sure won't be any more disgusting than the tactics the democrats used to pass that monstrosity in the first place.

Re: Politics

Posted: Thu May 10, 2018 12:37 am
by joez
Image
Image
Swamp-Draining Trump Administration Has Hired 187 Lobbyists, New Report Finds

It is about the lowest-hanging fruit around to point out that Donald Trump has not “drained the swamp”—i.e. addressed Washington’s corporate lobbying and corruption problems—despite having made such drainage one of his main campaign promises. ProPublica has provided a valuable service, however, by actually doing the legwork on this observation and finding out just how many lobbyists the Trump administration has hired. The answer is “at least 187,” many of whom have been appointed to positions in which they can do favors for the clients they used to represent. (And who they will no doubt represent in the future.) From a New York Times write-up of the data:

The administration has granted at least 31 waivers to some former lobbyists and others who had private-sector jobs that overlap with their new federal assignments, according to the database. Among them is Erik Baptist, a senior deputy general counsel at the Environmental Protection Agency. He previously worked for the American Petroleum Institute as a lobbyist on federal regulations related to renewable fuels.


Here are some other fun ones:

• Environmental Protection Agency official Troy Lyons worked as a lobbyist for British Petroleum.

• EPA deputy administrator nominee Andrew Wheeler lobbied on behalf of Murray Energy, which describes itself as “the largest underground coal mining company in America.”

• EPA official David Ross is a lawyer who represented industry clients in suits against the EPA.

• Health and Human Services official Laura Clay Trueman worked as a lobbyist for Aetna.

• Health and Human Services official Courtney Austin Lawrence worked for a health insurers’ lobbying association.

• Housing and Urban Development official Michael Kelley worked as a lobbyist for several real estate companies.

• FDA counsel Rebecca Kathleen Wood worked for Bayer Pharma and the pharmaceutical-industry lobbying group PhRMA.

Mmm … swamp water. (Disclosure: The author of this piece is registered to perform paid legislative advocacy on behalf of the Swamp Water Vendors’ Trade Association.)

Donald Trump


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... -much.html





Image
Image
Trump ignored warnings on the ACA, consumers will pay the price

No one should be surprised. When Donald Trump took steps to sabotage the health care system, as part of a political campaign against the Affordable Care Act, every relevant voice in the debate – insurers, hospitals, medical professionals, industry experts, et al – told the president that he would make things worse for the public.

There’s fresh evidence that those warnings were correct.

Two of Virginia’s ObamaCare insurers are requesting significant premium hikes for 2019, according to initial filings released Friday.

Both Cigna and CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield cited policies advocated by the Trump administration, including the repeal of ObamaCare’s individual mandate, as part of its justifications for the increases
.

When former HHS Secretary Tom Price accidentally told the truth last week about the effects of his party’s agenda, this is what he was referring to.

As complex as health care can be – everyone except the president knows how complicated it can be – this is quite simple. Trump took deliberate steps he knew would make health care coverage more expensive for millions of American consumers, and as a consequence, health care coverage is becoming more expensive for millions of American consumers.

Chet Burrell, the CEO of CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, conceded last week to the Washington Post that he fears the system is “materially worse” under Trump. He added, “Continuing actions on the part of the administration to systematically undermine the market and make it almost impossible to carry out the mission.”

In this case, the “mission” is to provide health care coverage to the public.

Before anyone suggests this is the natural result of an effective ACA model, it’s important to understand how wrong that argument is. Chet Burrell went on to say, “Did Obamacare work? Did the people who needed the coverage get it? Hell, yes.”

That was before Trump and congressional Republicans got to work – not repealing the ACA, but weakening the system in ways that impose fresh financial burdens on families for no good reason other than partisan spite.

The manifestation of the GOP campaign isn’t just seen in higher premiums; it’s also evident in the rising uninsured rate. We started seeing some hints of this in January, and the Commonwealth Fund bolstered the point with new data last week.

In theory, the stage appears to be set for a severe political backlash. Republican officials, for reasons they hardly even try to explain, made health coverage more expensive for millions, while imposing changes that left a growing number of Americans without coverage. If those adversely affected cast a ballot in November, the GOP should have a very bad day on Nov. 6.

In practice, is this likely? Maybe. Vox’s Dylan Scott had a good piece on this a couple of weeks ago.

Progressive operatives note that 2019 premiums are supposed to be announced in October – just a few weeks before the election. Given that last year’s premium increases were rightly attributed to Trump’s sabotage – and that voters tend to blame the party in power anyway for what is right or wrong with their health care – that could provide more ammunition for the Democrats in their final attacks right before voters head to the polls.

From special elections over the past year, we know health care has been a powerful motivator for Democratic voters. In his razor-thin win in Pennsylvania’s 18th Congressional District, Democrat Conor Lamb decisively won the health care vote. Then in this week’s Arizona special House election, Democrat Hiral Tipirneni made health care her signature issue – and, while she didn’t win, she lost to Republican Debbie Lesko by just [four] points in a district that Donald Trump won by 21. […]

Republicans can’t undo all of the damage of the past year. They have already voted for various unpopular repeal bills that would have left 20 million fewer Americans with health insurance and that would have unwound protections for people with preexisting conditions. Their Obamacare stabilization plans have now failed too.

The GOP strategy, at least for now, is to downplay health care as an issue altogether, abandon the party’s incessant “repeal” palaver, and hope voters’ attention lies elsewhere.

That’s a risky bet: Gallup found in March that health care access and affordability was the top worry on Americans’ minds. That’s hardly a recipe for Republican success in the fall.


http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show ... -the-price





Image
Image
Climate Change Could Destroy Even the Ocean's Most Pristine Parks

“Marine protected areas” have been an environmental success story. But a new study finds that most won’t withstand global warming.


“We should’ve known,” said John Bruno, “but we really didn’t.”

Bruno is a professor of marine biology at the University of North Carolina. Recently, he and his colleagues asked a simple question: If scientists know that climate change will alter national parks on land, how will it affect the thousands of national parks and conservation areas around the world that are underwater? The answer, published Monday in Nature Climate Change, shocked him.............


https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... ge/559757/





Image
Image
EXPLAINING

McCain Confirms He Gave Trump Dossier to Comey: ‘Duty Demanded I Do’ It

The senator describes that fateful decision in his upcoming book, ‘The Restless Wave.’


In his new book, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) confirms that he gave a controversial dossier about President Trump to former FBI chief James Comey.

“I agreed to receive a copy of what is now referred to as ‘the dossier,’” McCain writes in the upcoming book, titled The Restless Wave, referencing information compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. “I reviewed its contents. The allegations were disturbing, but I had no idea which if any were true. I could not independently verify any of it, and so I did what any American who cares about our nation’s security should have done.”


The Daily Beast obtained an advance copy of the book, due out May 22.

McCain writes that in November, 2016, he spoke with Sir Andrew Wood, a former British diplomat, at the Halifax International Security Forum. Wood alerted him to Steele's work after which, David Kramer, Senior Director for Human Rights and Human Freedoms at the McCain Institute, traveled to London to meet with Steele. Prior to this, as The Washington Post reported, Steele had already met with American officials in Rome to discuss his findings.

McCain recounts how he put the dossier in a safe in his office and called Comey’s office to request a meeting: “I went to see him at his earliest convenience, handed him the dossier, explained how it had come into my possession.”

“I said I didn’t know what to make of it, and I trusted the FBI would examine it carefully and investigate its claims. With that, I thanked the director and left. The entire meeting had probably not lasted longer than ten minutes. I did what duty demanded I do,” McCain concludes.

In other sections of the book, previously viewed by The Daily Beast and other outlets, the Arizona senator reflects on his life and in some parts harshly criticizes Trump.

“He has declined to distinguish the actions of our government from the crimes of despotic ones,” McCain writes. “The appearance of toughness, or a reality show facsimile of toughness, seems to matter more than any of our values.”


https://www.thedailybeast.com/mccain-co ... t?ref=home





Image
Image
McCain urges Senate to reject Haspel’s nomination

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) came out against Gina Haspel, President Trump’s nominee to be CIA director, on Wednesday after her confirmation hearing in the Senate.

In a break with President Trump, McCain urged his Senate colleagues to vote against Haspel, charging that "her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying."


McCain said Haspel in speaking to the Senate Intelligence Committee failed to address his concerns about her role in an enhanced interrogation program during the George W. Bush administration. The methods used in that program are now widely regarded as torture.

Haspel cannot afford to lose any additional Republican support. McCain is recovering from surgery related to his brain cancer in Arizona and was not expected to be present when the Senate votes on Haspel's nomination. With McCain out and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) opposed, Haspel still needs support from at least one Democratic senator as well as every other Republican to be confirmed.

"Like many Americans, I understand the urgency that drove the decision to resort to so-called enhanced interrogation methods after our country was attacked. I know that those who used enhanced interrogation methods and those who approved them wanted to protect Americans from harm. I appreciate their dilemma and the strain of their duty,” McCain said in a statement Wednesday.

“But as I have argued many times, the methods we employ to keep our nation safe must be as right and just as the values we aspire to live up to and promote in the world.”

McCain said that he believes Haspel “is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her professional life to its service and defense.”

“However, Ms. Haspel’s role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying,” he continued. “I believe the Senate should exercise its duty of advice and consent and reject this nomination."

McCain was tortured as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War. He had previously expressed skepticism about Haspel's nomination.


Haspel's ties to the interrogation program led to a contentious confirmation hearing on Wednesday in which Senate Democrats drilled down on her views on the subject. She did not answer when Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) repeatedly asked if Haspel believes past interrogation techniques were "immoral."

However, she pledged that she would not bring back the program.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said Wednesday that he will support Haspel's nomination. Several other GOP senators remain on the fence.

McCain's opposition to Haspel's nomination marked the latest instance in which the Arizona senator broke with Trump.

The president drew harsh criticism during the 2016 campaign when he disputed that McCain is a war hero, saying he prefers war heroes "who weren't captured."

Since Trump's election, McCain has frequently spoken out against Trump's rhetoric and the "spurious nationalism" sweeping the country, and wrote critically of Trump in his upcoming book.

In addition, McCain delivered the decisive vote to kill an ObamaCare repeal effort in the Senate last summer.


http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3870 ... nomination





Image
Image
Trump threatens to remove news networks' press credentials over negative coverage

President Trump early Wednesday suggested taking away news networks' press credentials over "negative" coverage.

"The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake)," Trump wrote on Twitter.

"Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?"

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?

6:38 AM - May 9, 2018


Trump frequently criticizes major news outlets for so-called fake news and has threatened in the past to remove press credentials for a number of outlets.

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump took away some news outlets' press credentials. Such outlets were able to cover his rallies but were cut off from his press conferences and any special access reporters with credentials normally receive.

Cutting off press credentials would not mean reporters can no longer cover the president.

Trump's latest threat to take away press credentials comes after The Washington Post and other outlets confirmed some of the claims made by adult-film star Stormy Daniels's attorney Michael Avenatti on Tuesday about Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen.

According to Avenatti, Cohen received $500,000 in the months after the 2016 election from a company run by a Russian oligarch with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Avenatti said the funding may have been used to reimburse the $130,000 payment Cohen made to Daniels to stay quiet about her alleged affair with Trump.


http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... tials-over





Image
Image
CIA tactics: What is 'enhanced interrogation'?

Details of harsh interrogation techniques used by the CIA on suspected terrorists have been made public by the US Senate Intelligence Committee.

Former US President George W Bush said the CIA had saved lives by using "enhanced interrogation techniques" to acquire information from suspects but insisted: "This government does not torture people."

President Barack Obama, however, condemned the CIA interrogation programme as a "dark and painful chapter" in US history and signed an executive order banning the techniques on his second day in office.


What are 'enhanced interrogation techniques'?

Shortly after the attacks on 11 September 2001, the CIA drew up a list of new interrogation techniques that included sleep deprivation, slapping, subjection to cold and simulated drowning, known as "waterboarding".

Waterboarding involves a prisoner being restrained on his back with their feet at a level higher than their head, or tied upside down. A cloth is placed over the prisoner's face or pushed into their mouth. Sometimes plastic film is used.

Water is then poured on to their face and into their nose and mouth. The prisoner gags almost immediately as the water starts entering the lungs.

As they start to feel they are drowning, they typically panic and struggle, and their body goes into spasm. Waterboarding can result in brain damage, broken bones and psychological damage.

Of all the revelations made about the “enhanced interrogation methods” used by the CIA on detainees in the aftermath of 9/11, the use of waterboarding and rectal feeding have garnered the most attention. In the case of the latter in particular, this was the first time many people had even heard of such a thing.

Initially used in response to prisoner hunger strikes, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found this allegedly “necessary” and “legitimate” medical practice – also referred to as a “nutrient enema” – was also used by the CIA as a form of torture and control.

According to the committee report “at least five CIA detainees were subjected to "rectal rehydration” or rectal feeding without documented medical necessity". The report identifies a chief of Interrogations referring to medically unnecessary rectal feeding and hydration as illustrative of the interrogator’s “total control over the detainee”.

Alongside the psychological effects of this torture, physical injuries were sustained by at least one detainee as a result of rectal feeding. The detainee was “diagnosed with chronic hemorrhoids, an anal fissure, and symptomatic rectal prolapse”..............


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11723189

http://theconversation.com/rectal-feedi ... t-it-35437





Image
Image
Donald Trump Has a Passionate Desire to Bring Back Torture

And that should be no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention.


TORTURE REDUX

It should come as no surprise to anyone who paid minimal attention to the election campaign of 2016 that Donald Trump has a passionate desire to bring back torture. In fact, he campaigned on a platform of committing war crimes of various kinds, occasionally even musing about whether the United States could use nukes against ISIS. He promised to return waterboarding to its rightful place among 21st-century US practices and, as he so eloquently put it, “a hell of a lot worse.” There’s no reason, then, to be shocked that he’s been staffing his administration with people who generally feel the same way (Secretary of Defense James “Mad Dog” Mattis being an obvious exception)..............

REVIVING THE BLACK SITES?

So far, President Trump hasn’t had the best of luck with his executive orders. His two travel bans, meant to keep Muslims from entering the United States, are at present trapped in federal court, but worse may be in the offing.

Trump promised during the campaign to reopen the CIA’s notorious black sites and bring back torture. Shortly after the inauguration, a draft executive order surfaced that was clearly intended to do just that. It rescinded President Obama’s orders 13491 and 13492 and directed the secretary of defense and the attorney general, together with “other senior national security officials,” to review the interrogation policies in the Army Field Manual with a view to making “modifications in, and additions to those, policies.” That would mean an end run around Congress, since it doesn’t take an act of that body to rewrite part of a manual (and so reinstitute torture policy).

It also called on the director of national intelligence, the CIA director, and the attorney general to “recommend to the president whether to reinitiate a program of interrogation of high-value alien terrorists to be operated outside the United States and whether such program should include the use of detention facilities operated by the Central Intelligence Agency.” In other words, they were to consider reopening the black sites for another round of “enhanced interrogation techniques.”


https://www.thenation.com/article/donal ... k-torture/





Image
Image
WOMEN RULE

Women trounce men on first major primary night of the year

But, overwhelmingly, it was Democratic women winning nominations in Republican-leaning districts.


Women romped in the first multi-state primary night of 2018, showing that enthusiasm for female candidates isn’t likely to wane anytime soon.

More than three in five female House candidates won their races in the states that held primaries: North Carolina, Indiana, West Virginia and Ohio. And of the 27 female House candidates who were successful, nearly 30 percent were women of color, according to data compiled by the Center for American Women and Politics.

With six state‘s primaries in the books — candidates in Texas and Illinois competed earlier this year, though Texas will have a runoff later this month — 2018 is shaping up to be a record-breaking year for female candidates. That’s true not just in terms of women signing up to run, but in the number who will appear on the ballot in November.

POLITICO‘s Women Rule Candidate Tracker is following the performance of female candidates this year in detail. The project is a research collaboration with the Center for American Women and Politics at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers-New Brunswick and the Women in Public Service Project at The Wilson Center.

Women will make up one-third of House nominees from the four states that held primaries Tuesday, a significant number considering that men accounted for more than 80 percent of all candidates running in those races............


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... rms-577374

<

Re: Politics

Posted: Thu May 10, 2018 11:04 pm
by joez
Image
Image
White House official mocked John McCain's cancer diagnosis

White House special assistant Kelly Sadler reportedly mocked Senator John McCain's brain cancer diagnosis during a meeting on Thursday led by deputy press secretary Raj Shah, after the Senator came out against CIA nominee Gina Haspel, according to The Hill's Jordan Fabian and Jonathan Easley.

Why it matters:

This is a brutal leak from the White House communications team as Sadler said, "It doesn't matter, he's dying anyway." The Hill reports that Sadler's comment "did not go over well with others at the meeting," but that "the conversation continued without addressing it." In a statement to the Hill, the White House responded to the claims saying, "We respect Senator McCain’s service to our nation and he and his family are in our prayers during this difficult time."

(REALLY! HAVE WE REALLY EVOLVED INTO THIS ?? :x :x :x :x)

https://www.axios.com/white-house-offic ... 54878.html






Image
Image
Fox Military Guest: Torture Is Good, ‘It Worked on John McCain’

Ret. Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a frequent Fox guest, made the ugly ‘Songbird’ remarks while dismissing McCain’s opposition to Trump CIA pick Gina Haspel.


According to a frequent Fox Business Network military commentator, torture is good because it worked on Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

McCain, who was tortured while a prisoner of war in Vietnam, has been outspoken in opposing Gina Haspel, President Trump’s pro-torture nominee to lead the Central Intelligence Agency.

Appearing Thursday morning on the Fox Business Network, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney took an ugly swipe at McCain for his opposition to torture, telling Varney & Co. host Charles Payne: “The fact is, is John McCain—it worked on John. That’s why they call him ‘Songbird John.’”

“The fact is those methods can work, and they are effective, as former Vice President Cheney said,” McInerney continued, in a clip first spotted by Media Matters. “And if we have to use them to save a million American lives, we will do whatever we have to.”

Contrary to McInerney’s claim, however, there is no evidence McCain ever gave up accurate information while being tortured in North Vietnam. In fact, the senator wrote in one of his books, “Pressed for more useful information, I gave the names of the Green Bay Packers’ offensive line, and said they were members of my squadron.”

(WOW! NOTHING LIKE KICKING A GUY WHEN HE'S DOWN :cry: :cry: :cry:)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news- ... n?ref=home






Image
Image
Cindy McCain chides White House aide who mocked husband's cancer

Sen. John McCain's wife, Cindy, on Thursday chided a White House official who mocked her husband's cancer diagnosis.

Cindy McCain responded to White House special assistant Kelly Sadler, who said the senator's opposition to President Trump's CIA nominee did not matter because "he’s dying anyway."

The Hill first reported Sadler's comment, made during a internal meeting on Thursday morning for communications staffers.

The White House did not deny Sadler made the remark, saying in a statement that "we respect Senator McCain’s service to our nation and he and his family are in our prayers during this difficult time."

Sadler did not respond to The Hill's request for comment and the White House did not make her available for comment. A source later told The Hill that Sadler called the senator's daughter Meghan McCain to apologize.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... nds-cancer






Image
Image
Fox Business Network host Charles Payne apologized on Thursday, after an analyst who appeared on his show said that torture "worked on" Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) during his time as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

"This morning on a show I was hosting, a guest made a very false and derogatory remark about Senator John McCain. At the time, I had the control room in my ear telling me to wrap the segment, and did not hear the comment," Payne tweeted.

"I regret I did not catch this remark, as it should have been challenged. As a proud military veteran and son of a Vietnam Vet these words neither reflect my or the network’s feelings about Senator McCain, or his remarkable service and sacrifice to this country."...........


http://thehill.com/homenews/media/38715 ... -on-mccain





Image
Image
Republicans Fill Court Seat They Denied To Obama For 6 Years

Ron Johnson and Mitch McConnell did whatever it took to hold the lifetime seat open for a GOP president to fill.


WASHINGTON ― The Senate voted Thursday to confirm Michael Brennan to a lifetime seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ― a vacancy that Republicans prevented President Barack Obama from filling for six years.

The vote, 49 to 46, was entirely partisan.

Until now, the seat was the nation’s longest circuit court vacancy. It was empty since January 2010, and it had been up to Wisconsin’s two senators to work with the White House to fill it. The reason it went unfilled for so long largely came down to one person: Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.).

Obama nominated Victoria Nourse to the seat in July 2010. Johnson denied her a confirmation hearing for all of 2011 by refusing to turn in his so-called blue slip, a Senate tradition whereby home-state senators have the ability to stop or advance a judicial nominee in the Judiciary Committee. Nourse withdrew her nomination in early 2012, calling the system “broken.............”


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mi ... 3b2c91818f

<

Re: Politics

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:50 pm
by Hillbilly
We really have to do something about spending. I am absolutely disgusted that we have a republican controlled everything and spending is still out of control. I have no idea what that party stands for anymore.

.

The federal government collected a record $2,007,451,000,000 in total taxes through the first seven months of fiscal 2018 (October through April), but still ran a deficit for that period of $385,444,000,000, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement.

The record total federal taxes collected during this period also included a record $1,050,601,000,000 in individual income taxes—marking the earliest in any fiscal year that individual income taxes have topped $1 trillion.

...

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/te ... 4b-deficit

.

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsrepor ... urrent.htm

Re: Politics

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:14 pm
by joez
Image
Image
Scoop: Peter Navarro's sharp words for Steven Mnuchin

A major rift has opened up between Trump's hardline trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, according to five sources familiar with their encounters.

What we're hearing: On the Trump delegation's trip to China two weeks ago, Navarro exchanged sharp words with Mnuchin over his decision to participate in one-on-one talks with his Chinese counterpart Liu He. Navarro — a hardliner against China — cursed at Mnuchin and fumed about being shut out of the talks, the sources said. "It stems from his belief that Mnuchin is steering them down the wrong path, policy-wise, with China," said a source familiar with their interactions.

Why this matters: China's top trade negotiator Liu He is visiting Washington this week for talks aimed at striking a deal with the U.S. to avoid a trade war. Meanwhile, Navarro has been concerned about Mnuchin leading Trump towards a deal that would give up on punishing China with aggressive tariffs for its theft of U.S. intellectual property.

The details: The White House has confirmed that the expected attendees at Thursday's talks are Mnuchin, Ross, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and NEC director Larry Kudlow.

The source added that the deputy director of the National Economic Council, Everett Eissenstat, is expected to staff the meeting.

Flashback: Top White House officials feud over China

Correction: An earlier version of this story cited a source confirming Bloomberg's reporting that Peter Navarro would not be present at Thursday's meeting. It has been updated to reflect a comment from the White House that Navarro and Larry Kudlow will be in attendance.


https://www.axios.com/scoop-peter-navar ... 62a06.html





Image
Image
Exclusive: 40% in U.S. can't afford middle-class basics

At a time of rock-bottom joblessness, high corporate profits and a booming stock market, more than 40% of U.S. households cannot pay the basics of a middle-class lifestyle — rent, transportation, child care and a cellphone, according to a new study.

Quick take: The study, conducted by United Way, found a wide band of working U.S. households that live above the official poverty line, but below the cost of paying ordinary expenses. Based on 2016 data, there were 34.7 million households in that group — double the 16.1 million that are in actual poverty, project director Stephanie Hoopes tells Axios.

Why it matters: For two years, U.S. politics has been dominated by the anger and resentment of a self-identified "forgotten" class, some left behind economically and others threatened by changes to their way of life.

The United Way study, to be released publicly Thursday, suggests that the economically forgotten are a far bigger group than many studies assume — and, according to Hoopes, appear to be growing larger despite the improving economy.

The study dubs that middle group between poverty and the middle class "ALICE" families, for Asset-limited, Income-constrained, Employed. (The map above, by Axios' Chris Canipe, depicts that state-by-state population in dark brown.)

These are households with adults who are working but earning too little — 66% of Americans earn less than $20 an hour, or about $40,000 a year if they are working full time.

When you add them together with the people living in poverty, you get 51 million households. "It's a magnitude of financial hardship that we haven't been able to capture until now," Hoopes said.

By the numbers: Using 2016 data collected from the states, the study found that North Dakota has the smallest population of combined poor and ALICE families, at 32% of its households. The largest is 49%, in California, Hawaii and New Mexico. "49% is shocking. 32% is also shocking," Hoopes said.


https://www.axios.com/americans-who-can ... 564ef.html





Image
Image
10 Children Saved From A California Home Were Allegedly Waterboarded And Shot With Crossbows And BB Guns

The children were "punched, strangled, bitten, shot with weapons" and "subjected to ‘waterboarding’ and having scalding water poured on them,” prosecutors wrote in a motion to increase their mother's bail.


“On a continuous basis the children were getting punched, strangled, bitten, shot with weapons such as crossbows and bb guns, hit with weapons such as sticks and bats, subjected to ‘waterboarding’ and having scalding water poured on them,” Deputy District Attorney Veronica Juarez wrote in the motion.

The abuse resulted "varying forms of scars, including broken arms," Juarez added.

Officers found the children at the Fairfield home, which they described as squalid and unsafe, after receiving a call on March 31 about a missing 12-year-old. When police arrived, they found the missing child's nine siblings "huddled together on the living room floor," according to the motion.

"There were clothes, garbage, and feces scattered everywhere," Juarez wrote. "The children appeared to be skittish and spoke with speech impediments."............


https://www.buzzfeed.com/skbaer/califor ... .abvvMg7Be





Image
Image
NET NEUTRALITY VIRALITY

Senate to Trump: Back Off Your Bid to End Net Neutrality

The president’s regulation will go forward in June anyway. But he got a slap on the wrist Wednesday.


The Senate on Wednesday delivered a rebuke to the Trump administration when all Democrats and three Republicans voted to reinstate net-neutrality regulations that the Federal Communications Commission scrapped last year.

The measure was largely symbolic, as it stands little chance of passing through the House of Representatives and virtually none at all of winning the signature of President Donald Trump. But it shows a political opening for proponents of net neutrality, should the balance of power swing toward the Democrats after the midterm elections later this year. It also illustrates that the debate over how data is transmitted on the Internet is not cleanly divided along partisan lines.

Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), John Kennedy (R-LA), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) were the only Republicans who voted for the resolution, which was introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA). Without their support, it would not have passed.............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/senate-to ... y?ref=home





Image
Image
TARGETED

Kremlin Used NRA to Help Trump in 2016, Senate Report Says

Documents suggest Moscow funneled money to Trump through the gun group, according to the judiciary committee.


The Senate Judiciary Committee said Wednesday that the Russian government apparently used the National Rifle Association to help Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016.

Documents suggest the Kremlin used the NRA to offer the campaign a back channel to Moscow—including a potential meeting between Trump and Vladimir Putin—and might have secretly funded Trump’s campaign, the committee said. One of the Russians named in the report even bragged she was part of the Trump campaign’s communications with Russia, The Daily Beast reported last year.

The NRA spent a record $30 million on Trump and the FBI is reportedly investigating whether any of the money came from Russia. U.S. law prohibits foreign money to be spent on elections.............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/kremlin-u ... e?ref=home





Image
Image
Republican-run Senate committee says Russia tried to help Trump win

That supports the intelligence community’s finding last year that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered the influence campaign to help Trump.


Russia tried to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election — and Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his government to do so.

That’s according to an official statement from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee released on Wednesday. The committee conducted months of interviews with current and former intelligence officials to verify if American spies correctly assessed last year that Russia favored Trump and tried to sway the 2016 presidential election. It turns out the Senate panel agrees with the US intelligence community.

“Our staff concluded that the [intelligence community’s] conclusions were accurate and on point,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said in a joint statement with the panel’s chair, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC). “The Russian effort was extensive, sophisticated, and ordered by President Putin himself for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton.”

They added that the committee had spent 14 months reviewing the evidence and saw no reason to dispute the intelligence committee’s conclusions. “There is no doubt that Russia undertook an unprecedented effort to interfere with our 2016 elections,” Burr said.............


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... -committee





Image
Image
Alleged Cohen documents leaker says they were motivated by missing files

A law enforcement official who claims to be the source of a leak about Michael Cohen claims that two documents related to suspicious transactions by President Trump's personal attorney appear to have gone missing from a government database.

The official told The New Yorker's Ronan Farrow that they had become worried after they were unable to find suspicious activity reports (SARs) pertaining to Cohen's financial actions in a government database. The official said they released the remaining SAR because they were afraid the documents were being kept from law enforcement officials.


The New Yorker was the first outlet to speak with the law enforcement official, who says the files were missing from the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
“I have never seen something pulled off the system,” the official said. “That system is a safeguard for the bank. It’s a stockpile of information. When something’s not there that should be, I immediately became concerned.”

“That’s why I came forward,” the official added.

Michael Avenatti, the attorney for Stormy Daniels, who is suing Cohen over a nondisclosure agreement she and he signed weeks before the 2016 election, first published the banking records from the released SAR last week.

The documents showed that Cohen was paid large amounts of money from companies such as Novartis and AT&T, as well as an investment firm with connections to Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg.

Novartis and AT&T have since said their payments to Essential Consultants LLC, Cohen's shell company, came after Cohen, who is reportedly under criminal investigation for possible bank fraud and campaign finance violations, offered them access to and insight on the Trump administration.

Avenatti refused to reveal his source for the information, saying investigators should detail the SARs filed on Cohen’s account.

“Why just those two missing?” the unnamed official asked The New Yorker. “That’s what alarms me the most.”

The Treasury Department established an investigation to determine the identity of the source last week.

The department's inspector general’s counsel, Rich Delmar, told The Hill that the office is probing allegations that federally mandated reports filed about Cohen’s banking transactions were “improperly disseminated.”

“To say that I am terrified right now would be an understatement,” the official told The New Yorker regarding potential legal consequences.

Essential Consultants is the same company that paid $130,000 to Daniels, who claims she had an affair with Trump more than a decade ago.


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... tivated-by





Image
Image
Donald Trump Jr. Called Blocked Number Before and After Trump Tower Meeting With Russians

That’s one revelation among many on a day when big news about the Trump investigation kept pouring out.


Donald Trump Jr. made several mysterious phone calls to blocked numbers before and after the Trump Tower meeting with Russians promising “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

The phone calls were revealed in a report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday
—part of a whirlwind day of revelations about the investigations into Trumpland. We learned, among other things, that the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign was deeper than previously known, and that there are millions of dollars more in suspicious financial dealings by Trump fixer Michael Cohen.

But the newly revealed actions of Trump Jr. may prove the most significant discovery, even if at the moment those actions raise more questions than answers. On the day he arranged the meeting the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, Trump Jr. placed two calls to blocked numbers. After the meeting ended without the promised dirt, Trump Jr. placed another call to a blocked number.

When asked if his father used a blocked number on any phone, Trump Jr. told the committee: “I don’t know.” Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, on the other hand, testified that Trump’s “primary residence has a blocked [phone] line.”

Asked directly if he had told his father about the meeting, Trump Jr. said, “I never discussed it with him at all.”

The phone calls began on June 6, 2016. That morning, Trump Jr. received an email from Rob Goldstone, music producer for Emin Agalarov, the son of Russian oligarch Aras Agalarov. Goldstone wrote that the Kremlin “offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary” and Trump Jr. should talk to Emin to arrange a meeting to obtain it.

Minutes after speaking to Emin, Trump Jr. placed a four-minute call to a blocked number.............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... s?ref=home





Image
Image
Women Are the Key to Winning Back the House for Democrats

The party is pinning its hopes of retaking the chamber on Pennsylvania, where seven women won their primaries on Tuesday.


There are currently no women representing the state of Pennsylvania. But come November, there could be as many as seven.

Eight women won their primaries on Tuesday—seven Democrats and one Republican. It was a promising sign for Democrats, who see Pennsylvania as ground zero in their effort to regain control of the House: The party needs to pick up 23 seats in November to win the House majority, and a chunk of those could be in Pennsylvania. Two key factors are helping them out: Congressional redistricting has made several House districts more favorable for Democrats, and five Republican lawmakers have announced their retirements, putting several districts up for grabs.

To have a chance at retaking the House, Democrats need to win in the state—and they’re going to be relying on women to do it. “In the three districts that the Democrats have a good chance to pick up—Pennsylvania 4, 5, and 6—the nominees are women,” said G. Terry Madonna, the director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, in an interview. That so many Pennsylvania women are running—and winning—matches a broader trend: More than twice as many women are running for Congress nationwide in 2018 than in 2016, and they’re winning their primaries in large numbers. The vast majority of those women are Democrats.............


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... se/560549/





Image
Image
‘Infuriated’ Jared Kushner Lost His Cool When Russians Didn’t Deliver Hillary Dirt

Kushner claimed he had no idea why he was in that notorious Trump Tower meeting. Newly-released testimony indicates otherwise.


Jared Kushner became “agitated” and “infuriate[d]” at the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting when a Kremlin-connected lawyer droned on about U.S. sanctions, instead of delivering on a promise to provide damaging information on Hillary Clinton. That’s according to Rob Goldstone, a British music promoter and friend of the Trumps who helped set up the meeting between Natalia Veselnitskaya and Donald Trump Jr.—and who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the Trump Tower confab.

Goldstone’s testimony stands in contrast to what Kushner said in public about the meeting. In a July 2017 statement, Kushner paints himself as bored and confused by Veselnitskaya’s presentation.

"I had no idea why that topic was being raised and quickly determined that my time was not well-spent at this meeting,” he told the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia inquiry, adding that he texted an assistant and asked for a call on his cell phone to excuse himself from the meeting.

But Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee concluded in their final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election that Kushner, along with Trump Jr. and Paul Manafort, "had expected to receive—but did not ultimately obtain—derogatory information on candidate Clinton" during the meeting.

Goldstone, for his part, testified that Kushner became visibly angry when Veselnitskaya delivered a lengthy diatribe about U.S. sanctions on Russia and their impact on adoptions—instead of handing over dirt on Clinton.


“After a few minutes of this labored presentation, Jared Kushner, who is sitting next to me, appeared somewhat agitated by this and said, I really have no idea what you're talking about. Could you please focus a bit more and maybe just start again?” Goldstone recalled of the meeting according to hearing transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. “And I recall that she began the presentation exactly where she had begun it last time, almost word for word, which seemed, by his body language, to infuriate him even more.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the discrepancy in recollections.............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/infuriate ... t?ref=home





Image
Image
REE-KY SITUATION

Atlanta’s Building Boom Is Destroying Its Famous Forests

After the recession, Georgia’s capital bounced back with a population surge and a housing boom—at the risk of the unique trees of the area.


The streets of Atlanta are lined with towering oaks, poplars, pines, and white-blooming dogwoods, earning it the nickname the “City in a Forest.”

They’re the remainder of the dense woodland that covered the Appalachian foothills before the city emerged before the Civil War. Some date back 200 years, making them a point of civic pride.

But an urban renaissance that’s drawing new residents by the thousands means the trees are losing ground to a building boom. While Atlanta has a public goal of keeping 50 percent of its territory in the shade, things are growing in a different direction—and that’s alarming some of its residents.


On one recent muggy Saturday morning, about 50 people turned out in a leafy east side neighborhood to protest a developer’s plans to take down more than 200 trees. The 4-acre site was once part of a farm owned by John B. Gordon, a Confederate general whose statue still stands on the state Capitol grounds. More recently, it was home to a private school. But now, a builder wants to put up more than 40 new townhomes on the site.............


https://www.thedailybeast.com/atlantas- ... s?ref=home





Image
Image
YET ANOTHER

Democrats Flip a Pennsylvania Seat, Making 41 Since Trump’s Inauguration

Helen Tai won her race with some endorsements from high places.


Democrats flipped another seat in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on Tuesday night, bringing the total number of state legislative flips to 41 since Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Helen Tai, the Democratic candidate running in the Bucks County Pennsylvania House District 178, defeated Republican Wendi Thomas on Tuesday night. The election was called after Republican Scott Petri resigned to work as the executive director of the Philadelphia Parking Authority. In the district, President Trump narrowly won 50-47, but underperformed 2012 presidential candidate Mitt Romney who won 56-43 against former president Obama.

In a sign of the growing importance of these local races to national Democrats, former vice president Joe Biden weighed in with his endorsement for Tai this month. Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley, whose PAC Win Back Your State is focusing on these down-ballot races, also endorsed Tai and he recently made an in-person appearance at her campaign office.

That combination of endorsements may have helped in another state legislative contest earlier this year in Florida, where Democrat Margaret Good easily flipped a Florida seat.

Since Trump’s inauguration, Democrats and specifically the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee have been working to capitalize on enthusiasm for various smaller contests to influence change at a local level as well as provide a metric for the upcoming midterm elections.

They have been successful in a number of typically red districts like one in Wisconsin earlier this year and even surprises in Oklahoma as far back as July 2017
.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats ... 3?ref=home





Image
Image
North Carolina Teachers Just Closed Schools With A Massive Protest

About a million public school students were out of the classroom.


Thousands of North Carolina teachers poured into downtown Raleigh and marched to the state’s General Assembly on Wednesday morning in the latest in a series of red-state public school teacher uprisings across the country.

The demonstration was believed to be the largest teacher protest in North Carolina’s history, with educators creating a sea of red on Fayetteville Street and inside the assembly galleries as they demanded more public school funding and better salaries for school staffers.

The largest school districts in the state announced closures once it became clear that not enough teachers would be in the classroom. Roughly a million students were out of school as a result, according to the News & Observer, a Raleigh-based paper.


What all these states have in common is flat or falling investment in schools paired with tax cuts that have primarily benefited businesses and the wealthy. The walkouts have largely been a revolt against the austerity of Republican-led statehouses, which has left the states with little money to devote to salaries and textbooks.

According to the National Education Association, North Carolina ranks 39th in public school teacher pay in the U.S. Teachers received a 4.2 percent pay bump last year, but they still earn less than what they were making a decade ago when adjusted for inflation. Per-student public school spending is down about 8 percent over the same period, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no ... 9b4dffc153





Image
Image
Donald Trump Jr. was involved in discussions to locate a Trump Tower in Moscow in 2013, according to congressional testimony by someone else who was a party to the negotiations

Sources, new documents reveal depth of Trump's 2013 Moscow push

WASHINGTON
The Trump Organization’s pursuit in 2013 of a tower in Moscow bearing the Trump name was much farther along than previously disclosed, with a memorandum of understanding signed and financing arranged, according to new documents released to the public and information obtained by McClatchy.

President Donald Trump and his children have described a possible Moscow hotel deal in only the broadest of terms, calling it something that grew out of the Miss Universe contest held in Moscow that year.

Sources tell McClatchy, however, that by then talks had been under way for months and architectural drawings had been submitted. One of the sources of planned financing was the Sapir family, which had backed the now-failed Trump Soho project in Manhattan years earlier.

“I think it was a fairly far along deal,” said a person with direct knowledge of the deal, who demanded anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

The revelations add another dimension to the depth of discussions between Trump's organization and his family and individuals in Russia, many of them close to its leader, Vladimir Putin. Trump has long insisted, including in early 2017, before he took office, that "I have nothing to do with Russia."

A statement from Donald Trump Jr. given to the Senate Judiciary Committee was among the more than 2,500 pages of congressional testimony released unexpectedly by the panel on Wednesday. The documents involved some of the players in the now infamous June 2016 meeting between a Russian lawyer and Trump campaign officials at Trump Tower.............


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation- ... row1_card1





Image
Image
Scott Pruitt Just Testified Before Congress. It Didn’t Go Well.

Democrats pressed and ridiculed him for his various scandals and extravagant spending.


Given an opportunity to address the scandals that have dominated his 16 months at the head of at the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt admitted Wednesday, “I would not make the same decisions again.” It was the only time in the two-hour Senate hearing that Pruitt took any responsibility for the decisions that have led to at least 14 federal investigations into his ethical conduct, alleged retaliation against whistleblowers, and extravagant spending.

Pruitt didn’t elaborate on his regrets. Instead, he made ample use of the passive voice when discussing specific issues raised by Senate Democrats. For instance, in addressing the secure phone booth that was installed in his office at a cost of $43,000 to taxpayers, he said, “There were not proper controls early to ensure a legal review.”

Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) pressed Pruitt another of his more controversial expenditures: a round-the clock security detail his predecessors did not have. The senators asked Pruitt whether he had personally requested the detail on his first day in office.

Pruitt maintained that the EPA’s criminal enforcement office made the decision independently, adding carefully, “I did not direct that on the first day.”

“So your answer is no,” Van Hollen replied, noting that Pruitt had just directly contradicted a letter from the EPA inspector general stating that Pruitt had “requested 24/7 protection once he was confirmed as Administrator.”

In another exchange about whether he had asked for sirens and flashing lights to be used to expedite a trip to his “favorite” Washington restaurant, the upscale French eatery Le Diplomate, Pruitt answered, “There are policies in place regarding the use of lights. Those policies were followed by the agencies.” Asked again if he had personally made the request, Pruitt said, “I don’t recall that.”

Udall also asked Pruitt how he came to pay below-market rent for a condo owned by a lobbyist with business before the EPA. Pruitt said his EPA aide Milian Hupp looked for housing on his behalf “on personal time.” Udall asked if Hupp was paid for her work, and Pruitt said no. “Then that’s a gift,” Udall said. “That’s in violation of federal law.” (Federal law that prohibits significant gifts from subordinates.)

Pruitt was ridiculed for another of his professional extravagances: flying in first class. The EPA has maintained that his flight upgrades were necessary for his safety after he had been heckled. “What a silly reason,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) remarked in his opening statement. “Nobody even knows who you are…You have to fly first class? Oh, come on.”

Pruitt confirmed that he had set up a legal defense fund, which experts see as yet another ethical minefield because the administrator’s biggest supporters hail from industries that are prohibited from donating.

Van Hollen asked Pruitt if he will ensure that he doesn’t accept donations from lobbyists and people who have business before the EPA. Pruitt gave one of his few direct replies of the day: “Absolutely.”


https://www.motherjones.com/environment ... t-go-well/





Image
Image
President Donald Trump's most recent disclosure form showed the president reimbursed Michael Cohen in 2017 for his $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, who claims to have had an affair with Trump.

Ethics chief knocks Trump over Stormy Daniels payment

The president's reimbursement of the $130,000 paid to the adult film actress wasn’t included on last year’s financial form.


The government’s top ethics officer told the Justice Department on Wednesday that President Donald Trump should have disclosed last year that he reimbursed his longtime personal attorney for a “hush money” payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

The letter from David Apol, the acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, came as that office also released Trump’s most recent financial disclosure form, a 92-page document that included the reimbursement to attorney Michael Cohen as a footnote.

While the document provides the firmest proof yet of Trump’s involvement in the slow-brewing scandal around the $130,000 “hush money” deal struck shortly before the election over an alleged affair between Trump and Daniels, it’s not clear what consequences Trump may face for failing to disclose the transaction.

"OGE has concluded that, based on the information provided as a note to part 8, the payment made by Mr. Cohen is required to be reported as a liability," Apol wrote to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, adding, "you may find the disclosure relevant to any inquiry you may be pursuing regarding the President's prior report that was signed on June 14, 2017."

“If DOJ investigates and determines that president Trump knew of his debt to Cohen when he filed last year’s report, there will be reason to suspect that his omission of the debt from last year’s report was ‘knowing and willful,’ which would be a crime,” Shaub, who resigned in July 2017, said in a written statement. “No one from the Trump camp asked OGE last year whether the debt was reportable and that, instead, President Trump’s attorney asked OGE to allow him to be the first filer in history to be excused from the obligation to certify that his report was true.”

“There is substantial evidence that President Trump had knowledge of the loan when he filed his public financial disclosures last year, despite his failure to report it,” Bookbinder said. “If the department is not already investigating the president’s failure to disclose the loan last year, it should open an investigation immediately.”


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... ear-591886






Image
Image
Preet Bharara being drafted for war on Trump

The fired U.S. attorney doesn’t like politics, but his admirers are pressing him to wage a campaign to succeed Eric Schneiderman.


Preet Bharara is seeing all the texts, phone calls and DMs urging him to run for New York attorney general, including from some top operatives and Democratic donors. He’s hearing it from people coming up to him on the street.

And though Bharara is leaning against making a play for the job, according to three people close to him, the onetime powerhouse U.S. attorney fired by Donald Trump pointedly hasn’t said no, either. He wants to see how the next few weeks play out.

Among the people who’ve reached out, the sources said, are Mike Bloomberg consigliere Howard Wolfson and independent-minded GOP consultant John Weaver, along with a host of top Democratic operatives, donors and fundraisers.

“He’s the Eliot Ness that we need today,” said Weaver, who confirmed that he reached out to Bharara despite not previously knowing him. “I understand that he wouldn’t want to campaign, and it would be distasteful. [But] in this case, it would be a crusade. And crusades are never distasteful.”

The pleas are partly a response to the sainted status that Bharara has achieved since he forced President Donald Trump to fire him last year by refusing to resign. But they’re also a sign of dissatisfaction with how the field of candidates for the plum law enforcement post is shaping up. The key qualifications are less about legal skills and more about who can navigate muddy New York politics compounded by the backroom machinations of Gov. Andrew Cuomo..............


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/ ... man-595083





Image
Image
1. LIFTING CLOUD5

Giuliani: Mueller Team Told Trump Lawyers They Can’t Indict President


Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday claimed to CNN that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team told President Trump’s lawyers that they cannot indict a sitting president. “All they get to do is write a report,” Giuliani, who currently serves as a Trump lawyer, told CNN reporter Dana Bash. “They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us.”

According to Dash, however, that special counsel conclusion “is likely based on longstanding Justice Department guidelines” and “not about any assessment of the evidence Mueller’s team has compiled.” The reporter additionally cautioned: “A lack of an indictment would not necessarily mean the president is in the clear.”


https://www.thedailybeast.com/giuliani- ... t?ref=home

Re: Politics

Posted: Thu May 24, 2018 10:50 am
by Hillbilly
Investor's Business Daily

Bad News For Dems: Household Income Hits All-Time High Under Trump … And He's Getting Credit For It

5/22/2018

Growth: A new report shows that the median household income has climbed 3% since President Trump took office. It's another sign of a strong economy, and at least one poll shows the public credits Trump for the good news. Should Democrats wave bye to the Blue Wave?

Median household income has been steadily increasing under Trump, rising from $59,471 in January 2017 to $61,483 last month, according to Sentier Research, which tracks income on a monthly basis using census data.

This also means that household income is now higher than it's been in at least 50 years — after adjusting for inflation.

This is a sharp turnaround from the Obama years. Sentier data show that median household income was the same when President Obama left office as when he arrived. Under Obama, household incomes continued to fall steeply for two full years after the recession officially ended, and then took four years to make up that lost ground. Incomes then flatlined again, posting no overall gain between August 2015 and December 2016.


This is just another indication that the economy has notably strengthened under Trump. And polls show that the public's mood has brightened considerably as a result.

The latest IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index is 53.6. This index has been in positive territory (anything over 50 is optimistic) since Trump took office. The Quality of Life Index, meanwhile, hit a 14-year high in May and the Financial Stress Index is at an all-time low.

Gallup's tracking poll shows that 67% now say it's a good time to find "a quality job in the U.S.," which is the highest since Gallup started asking this question 17 years ago. The best this measure ever got under Obama was a paltry 45%.

CNN's poll finds that 57% now say "things are going well in the U.S.," up from just 49% in February.

The latest CBS News/YouGov poll found that 64% rate the economy as somewhat or very good.

Wave Bye To The Blue Wave?

But what must really concern Democrats is that 68% of the public now says Trump's policies deserve at least some of the credit, according to the CBS poll. Thirty-five percent say he deserves a "great deal" of credit for the current economy, while only 11% say he deserves none at all.


That same poll found the Democratic advantage in the "generic ballot" at only +2 points. The latest Reuters poll has Republicans up by almost 6 points. As recently as March, Democrats had an average 9-point lead on this question — which is seen as an indicator of the enthusiasm for the two parties going into the midterm elections in November.

Trump's approval numbers have also been eking out steady gains.

Naturally, this spate of good news has garnered little attention in the press, which remains fixated on the phony Russia scandal and, more broadly, on bringing down the Trump administration.

So, does Trump deserve credit for the upturn in the economy?

Consider this: President Obama raised taxes, imposed massive new regulations and mandates, and routinely berated the private sector. The economy responded with the worst economic recovery in modern times.

Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress have gone in the exact opposite direction, with sweeping tax cuts and significant deregulation. And since then we've seen growth, income, optimism all moving upward.

Given that, we think the public has it right for giving Trump credit for this turnaround.

https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... -optimism/

Re: Politics

Posted: Fri May 25, 2018 12:08 pm
by joez
Happy the economy is doing well !!! I haven't experienced any significant changes to my personal finances. In fact, things got worse. Prices have gone up on groceries and retail items. Gas has skyrocketed. In a few places, the price of gas has hit the $3.40 mark and continues to rise. I received a thousand dollar bonus thanks to trump. Didn't go very far. Not like the top 1% anyway.

But bad news on all other fronts and in particularly, the Russia investigation and the mind boggling intrusion into our criminal justice system by the chief executive.

When you start forcing the DOJ and FBI to publicly announce CI's names and the evidence they've accumulated and turned over to the property authorities, you start becoming an enemy of the state, traitorous acts in my opinion.

When you start forcing the DOJ and the FBI to upchuck evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation where your are the subject of the investigation is heart stopping.

The net is closing in around trump and the trump family and the chaos and panic continues to abound as trump continues to undermine Mueller, the DOJ and the FBI, and in the process, weakening the confidence US citizens have for these organizations and certainly a threat to our security around the world.

Then there was the North Korean incident. Kim Jon-un invited a bus load of foreign correspondents to witness the destruction of a nuclear facility hidden deep in the mountains where the trek was culminated by a two hour hike. No nuclear experts were allowed to attend! What a joke! Shortly after the blast, Trump made the announcement that he was terminating the summit placing the correspondents in jeopardy. Fortunately, there were no incidents but it could have been compromising.

The tariffs don't seem to be effecting those companies in the middle east very much. The Incoterms call for our business to absorb all shipping costs including transport, insurance, duties, and taxes. We push back and compromise but that's the way it is.





Some Headlines From Today's News:


GOP senator Jeff Flake condemns 'moral vandalism' from Trump's White House


Senate GOP sounds alarm over Trump's floated auto tariffs

Trump takes aim at the family car with new tariff threat

McConnell says he backs Mueller probe after classified briefing

Trump: ‘Spy’ was placed in campaign ‘way earlier than the Russian Hoax'

Dems after briefing: 'No evidence' spy placed in Trump campaign

Cohen discussed US-Russia relations with oligarch days before inauguration: report

Graham: Trump 'probably' shouldn't call use of FBI informant 'spygate'

Border Patrol union chief calls Trump troop deployment 'a colossal waste'

Surging gas prices could fuel backlash against Trump

New York Republicans run from Trump

“Spygate,” the false allegation that the FBI had a spy in the Trump campaign, explained
Stefan Halper, a professor and FBI informant, didn’t "spy" on Trump. Here’s what actually happened.


Women who fought to lift the women’s driving ban in Saudi Arabia are getting arrested

"Removed Rachel Maddow content......the content was from 2014"

Re: Politics

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2018 9:20 am
by Hillbilly
Black unemployment rate hits new record low in May

by Pete Kasperowicz | June 01, 2018 08:44 AM

The unemployment rate for black workers hit new record lows in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Black unemployment fell sharply to 5.9 percent, beating out the 6.6 percent record low that was set a month earlier.

The unemployment rate for Hispanic workers hit a record low in April, at 4.8 percent, but it rose slightly to 4.9 percent in May.

The total unemployment rate for white workers dropped from 3.6 percent to 3.5 percent.

President Trump has cheered the record low unemployment rates seen for black workers on his watch. He and his supporters have pointed to the falling numbers for black workers as proof that Trump is working to better the lives of all Americans, even as Trump's critics continue to say Trump is a racist who should be removed from office.

The total unemployment rate for all workers fell to 3.8 percent, from 3.9 percent in April.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... low-in-may