6067
by J.R.
Why the Cleveland Indians' signing of Juan Uribe makes (temporary) sense
Zack Meisel, cleveland.com
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- When a team has holes on its roster, has limited funds and doesn't want to part with prospects, it ends up with a 37-year-old Opening Day third baseman.
And, really, Juan Uribe isn't a poor fit for the Indians. Not yet, at least.
With no way to know what Giovanny Urshela can provide with his bat -- and with the Indians hesitant to find that out in April and May, when they will likely be without Michael Brantley -- Uribe offers somewhat of a safety net.
Maybe he'll flame out by midseason, a la Mark Reynolds. Maybe he'll be part of a mass exodus of underperforming veterans in July, a la Brandon Moss, Michael Bourn and Nick Swisher. Or, maybe he'll force Urshela to truly earn playing time at the hot corner, rather than fall into it because Lonnie Chisenhall needed a change of scenery.
Though Uribe will turn 37 two weeks before Opening Day, even at that heightened age -- he played with Larry Walker, Ron Gant, Denny Neagle and Sal Fasano, for goodness sake -- he might be a better alternative than anyone else in-house.
The Indians could have landed Todd Frazier, but they scoffed at Cincinnati's asking price. Instead, Frazier relocated to a different American League Central team, the White Sox.
How much of an upgrade would Frazier have been over Uribe?
Over the last three years:
Uribe: .281/.329/.432 slash line, 114 OPS+, 10.5 WAR
Frazier: .255/.320/.457 slash line, 113 OPS+, 12.2 WAR
Granted, Frazier has logged 700 more plate appearances during that stretch and has socked 48 more home runs. There are reasons he has played more, even though their rates of production have been similar.
Uribe will be a one-year stopgap, at most, which follows the front office's recent operating trend. With this ownership, the Indians are never going to hand out a sizable contract to a free agent. Uribe, Mike Napoli and Rajai Davis will combine to earn base salaries of about $17 million in 2016. All figure to be one-year Band-Aids.
Many, like Joe Z. in Chicagoland, have asked why the team doesn't simply pool that $17 million and funnel it toward one imposing slugger. If a hitter would take that sum for one or two years, it might work. That's rarely the case, though, and the Indians aren't in the business of offering five- or six-year commitments.
For what its worth, Uribe has made a name for himself as a valuable clubhouse presence (and, on an unrelated note, he is not a football fan).
Defensive metrics rated Uribe highly at third base in 2013 and '14. He totaled 32 defensive runs saved, with a high zone rating, during those two years, per FanGraphs. Last year, he checked in with an average rating.
Defense is the one area in which the Indians have no qualms regarding Urshela. For now, the 24-year-old will likely have to hone his offensive ability at Triple-A. He posted a .225/.279/.330 clip with the Tribe last year.
This off-season, the Indians added a 34-year-old first baseman, a 35-year-old left fielder and a 37-year-old third baseman to an offense that escaped from misery only after the club dealt away its aging veterans last summer.
Will it work this time around? Time will tell. Handing Uribe $4-5 million isn't really a high-risk maneuver, though.
The Indians are just in a position in which they have more confidence in a stocky, soon-to-be-37-year-old than any of their other third-base options.