Hey, it counts!

But it only counts for one run. We should have 7 or 8 runs by now!

11th inning and again we have bases loaded one out. Gomes at bat 3-2 and

ball four woo woo

10 walks 4 with the bases loaded. Really? What is the record?
Scoring strictly with walks? Kipnis up

This has been one weird game, man.

Red Sox had 6 bases loaded walks in a game and lost, Underwood just said. Against ChiSox in '92.

WOW! SAC FLY!!

just noted that Boston did have a game with 6 bases loaded walks. But they lost. Sac Fly by Kipnis 5-3 two out

Hey, we got something other than a walk with the bases loaded!

Unfortunately it was just a sac fly.

Lindor with a base hit! ... Oops ... Moss gunned down at plate.

Hopefully this 2 run lead will be safe.

..............WE WIN!!!

That was perhaps the least impressive victor I have ever witnessed. Left the bases loaded numerous times [Santana alone twice and left 2 on once]. Not one of the 5 runs scored on a hit. Closer blew the lead.

My question of the day: Why pinch hit for Carrasco when he was pitching great and had thrown 76 pitches in 6 innings? Yeah, there were two on and one out and we had a chance to blow it open, but I thought was a dumb move.

Tito talked after the game about the weather/delay being the factor with Carrasco.

I can buy that. And that was also the excuse Reds used for Cueto being unable to find home plate. I imagine it also explains why Santana's mini-hot streak ended and he left the bases loaded twice and two on another time.

Does it reflect more poorly on the Tribe that they can't score a run unless it's a bases loaded walk?

Or on the Reds because they gave up so many bases loaded walks?

Was nice to win that one in extra innings, I thought for sure we would have lost it.

I was very disappointed that it reached extra innings. I'm so used to Allen getting the job done that I was startled that he let runs in two innings in a row.