Re: General Discussion

2448
Jason Kipnis had 136 at bats in 2011. If Wikipedia is correct, he is not eligible for Rookie of The Year missing it by 6 too many at bats.



From 1947 through 1956, each BBWAA voter used discretion as to who qualified as a rookie. In 1957, the term was first defined as someone with fewer than 75 at bats or 45 innings pitched in any previous Major League season.[1] This guideline was later amended to 90 at bats, 45 innings pitched, or 45 days on a Major League roster before September 1 of the previous year.[1] The current standard of 130 at bats, 50 innings pitched or 45 days on the active roster of a Major League club (excluding time in military service or on the disabled list) before September 1 was adopted in 1971.[1][6]

Re: General Discussion

2451
And since we took this series against The Cardinals, who still have over 100 games to improve, we now have won our last two series.

Over contenders, on the road, in their parks.

And now we are off for 12 less meaningful games against the National League, including 6 with one of J.R.'s lesser "than Indian" favored teams...the Reds.

I greatly dislike this part of the schedule.

Re: General Discussion

2454
Your numbers may vary, but I'm clocking Casey Kotchman at .258 since May 1. I love his leather and heads up play. He's tracking to 60 RBI's and 15 home runs on the season. Not prototype for a 1st baseman, but his leather is special.

Believe it or not, with his overall .228 he is still at #18 among the 30 first baseman in MLB batting averages for the season.


If he continues at a .258 pace, he'd be in the Top Ten as of today.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/batting/_/position/1b